Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Shrmdougluvr, post: 327205, member: 396"]
I suppose this is a cynical evaluation of that farce (I say that bc i believe it is nowhere near what we will actually see) of a depth chart - In sum on paper, this team does not look any bigger or more athletic than any team P or RObinson put on the field during the preceding decade.
 
The defense is tiny. Other than the d-tackle position, the defense is grossly undersized. I know Shafer loves his fast, attacking d, but it doest due much good when teams just run power  at you over and over (recurring nightmare from uconn game last year). Talk of the okie package on here always cracks me up because to me, the team is in a base nickel or dime anyway (Davis and Diabate are glorified safeties).
 
On offense, i just think it is too far from a finished product to even comment. I agree with Tomcat that the top four wideouts will be Lemon, Sales, Kobenah and West. Dont know enough about the oline from a talent/injury standpoint to really comment. Can't imagine a healthy pugh gets surplanted though.
 
Here is my novel suggestion to coach Marrone - Move Broyld to Mike, give him a redshirt year, and you have a four year starter with the actual size, speed and strength to make an impact at the position.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?