Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 1002474, member: 1969"] Why does a team that is 7-4 deserve to be seeded below Kentucky who is 4-6 vs top 50 (with wins over Louisville, 2 #11 seeds, and an NIT Team). To be fair it's closer to 4-4 for UK, when you discount for losses to #1 seeds on a road and neutral court. UMass decided on the floor over the course of the season that it deserved a slightly higher seed or certainly the same. Why hould some ex coaches who love big name talent like everybody else and will be biased by it, improve things? The people that have a clue will always push the more "talented" teams to the top, the big conference schools, the teams with NBA talent. They will not have enough knowledge of the majority teams outside the top 15 to make any sort of reasonable assessment. After all those more talented teams from Syracuse, Kansas, Duke lost pretty damn early. [/QUOTE]