Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="HRE Otto IV, post: 4607817, member: 5685"] I think part of the problem is too much emphasis on not having bad losses. That is great but if you play no one and beat no one, what does it matter? They have things backwards. Look at good Ws then if further separation is needed punish for bad Ls. If you look at their schedules there is no way Utah St or Nevada get in. I wish there was an accurate metric that could be used to compare teams across conferences. Until then use common sense. MWC gets 1-2 teams tops. Can’t have 10-6 in conference with No OOC get in. IMO they should look at… 1. Who did you beat (overall record, conf record, OOC Ws) 2. Who did you play (conf and OOC) 3. Where did you play (need to show road and neutral Ws) 4. Who did you lose to (bad Ls) Proving that you can actually beat someone IMO is more important than a random bad L. You can excuse that. Instead people dismiss teams Bs use of a bad L. [/QUOTE]