Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Lacrosse Board
Twitter Q&A with Chris Jastrzembski
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Newhouse_83, post: 3022394, member: 7139"] When a guy works in/for the program, then leaves and attempts to cover it, it's problematic for all concerned, just as it would be for a lobbyist to be appointed to lead the agency that regulates his former employer. Ethically, even if a writer doesn't know not to take a gig like this and pretend to be objective (disclosure: I write for a living), an employer who hires someone who recently worked for a particular program should have him cover a different program ... probably one in a different conference. It's one thing for Stephen Bailey to cover SU football; he's a journalist and never drew a paycheck from the program. It was clear from a year-end piece at TNIAAM that lacrosse-writer guy was still WAY too close to certain players, and he basically admitted he was incapable of being objective about them. Part of the issue, I'm convinced, is there are problems with conveying ideas -- that seems to be what people are saying about the comment that redshirt seniors are bad ... but wait, they're good! A mid-April piece after the UNC collapse is a good example (to the extent that I saved it for use when I was going to speak to a journalism class about the need for good editing). It drew some erroneous conclusions, like UNC assigning its poles to SU's mids "didn't really make a difference" when, in fact, the first midfield was held to less than half its scoring average, and Trimboli was held without a point. There was also a misunderstanding about how UNC was able to win faceoffs in the fourth quarter, and an illogical conclusion that Buttermore was "a big contributor" not because he scored a bunch of points from the second midfield, but because he got a few runs with the first unit. For readers, it's caveat emptor, and there are some clear warning signs with the above arrangement. For serious fans like the folks who form the core of this board's community, you're probably not going to get significant insight from someone a couple years out of school if he wasn't setting the world on fire when he was at the DO or wherever he was as an undergrad. There are some recent exceptions in more major sports -- Tyler Dunne, Michael Cohen, Jesse Dougherty and Sam Fortier come to mind; Pete Thamel is an earlier example -- but these guys were already the cream of the crop when they were undergrads. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Lacrosse Board
Twitter Q&A with Chris Jastrzembski
Top
Bottom