Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="caw, post: 199109, member: 1764"]
Heck, going by the seeding argument you could say that UConn 2011 was as good in the regular season/BET as Syracuse 2003.  Both were 3 seeds in the tournament.  Do you agree with that statement?  If, yes.  Then sure, UConn had an easier road but even that "one-man" team was as good as Cuse's NC in the regular season.  If no, then it shows cross-comparing years based on seeding is just stupid off the bat.  I lean to the second.
 
My argument isn't that UConn had a tough road.  My argument is that you can't compare Cuse's 2003 road and UConn's 2011 road based on cometition seeding from different years.  Heck I prefer your argument that, "Butler didn't look good and was weakass".  That at least admits the fact you are basing off of your viewing opinion not some sort of made up fact that doesn't exist to cross-compare years.
 
In my viewing opinion, I would agree Cuse had a harder road.  There are zero empirical facts to back that up.  Do you get the difference?
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?