Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="kingottoiii, post: 351247"] Until I see something from another RB I want Broyld to be the next Daniel Thomas. However if the Frosh are as good as advertised then it would be nice to have Broyld be used all over. Then again next year he may be forced to play QB only because we aren't expected to have a good passing game anyway. Losing Sales and Lemon will certainly hurt. Speaking of Sales he is such a good route runner and deceptively fast that he makes you wonder how is he always open. Not the same skill set but similar traits as a poor man's Harrison. Thought the O gameplan was good we just couldn't execute the first half. Between some bad passes and a few drops we really hurt ourselves. I would like to see Smith get fewer carries. If he would have had 6 instead of 16 and split those other 10 to PTG and Broyld it would have been perfect IMO. OL should finally be a strength next year. We will have 6 of 7 guys who got PT this year back. We will need them with questions in the passing game due to a new QB and losing our two best WRs. I thought the D gameplan to start was great. However when they started to go with a WR/TE on one side and screen us to death we never made an adjustment. We didn't get burnt on that but made it very easy on USC. We could still play the same coverage and get up on that. Like the way Diabate plays but he was overmatched this game. I think he will be fine but what worries me more is MLB next year. We lose him and Vaughan. That will be a huge hole next year. As will Shamarko. Kid is the only playmaker we have on D. Great in run support as he makes a ton of tackles in open space. Good news is one of Desir, Esk, Ford, or Morgan should be able to ease the pain. I hope that Marrone will learn from his in game decisions but he has been pretty consistant for 4 years now. I gotta think he is who he is. [/QUOTE]

Verification: What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?