Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SWC75, post: 1145040, member: 289"] Again this year I’m going to keep track of how teams have done against ranked teams. And again I’ll remind the reader that this is not itself an attempt to rank teams, although I will have cumulative standings: it’s intended just as a stat to look at in determining where teams should rank. Also, as with all stats, the early results are hardly definitive but they will become more meaningful as the season progresses. Another issue is that I’m using a team’s ranking at the time the game is played, not their final ranking. When we played Northwestern last year, they were ranked 19th in the writer’s poll, (the one I use for this). They wound up 5-7 and unranked. Auburn, coming off a 3-9 season, was unranked. They wound up playing for the national title. But I’d have to wait to the end of the season to compute this using the final rankings, by which time no one would care about a breakdown of some of a team’s games. I’m trying to maintain a running tally of how teams are doing in their biggest games. Besides, a tams ranking at the time you played them may truly reflect how good the team was at that time. Northwestern played like a top ten team against us and went on to a 4-0 start before losing a series of close games. Auburn was not as great early in the season as they later became. Also I’m not making any allowances for home vs. road, (which I think affects the top teams less than the mediocre teams), or injured players, the impact of which is impossible to compute, (and top teams can usually replace guys). So here we go. I’ll stick to the writer’s poll for the rankings for consistency, (I need one #1 team, one #2 team, etc.) and because they have a poll each week from preseason to post season. The formula is pretty simple, although there are two parts to it. First you compute the “schedule points”. A team gets 25 points for playing the #1 ranked team, 24 points for playing the #2 ranked team, 23 points for playing the #3 ranked team, etc. down to getting 1 point for playing the #25 ranked team. Then you add or subtract to/from that the margin of victory or defeat. If they have any positive points left, I’ll record it here and add them up as the season goes along. I’m not going to record any net negatives or I would be documenting the season of Louisiana-Lafayette or somebody like that. That’s not what we are interested in here. We want to know about teams likely to wind up ranked and in consideration for the playoffs or the bowls. WEEK FIVE UCLA beat #15 Arizona State by 35 points = 46 points ARKANSAS lost to #6 Texas A&M by 6 = 14 points MISSOURI beat #13 South Carolina by 1 = 14 points TENNESSEE beat lost to #12 Georgia by 3 = 11 points NORTH CAROLINA STATE lost to #1 Florida State by 15 = 10 points WASHINGTON lost to #16 Stanford by 7 = 3 points SYRACUSE lost to #8 Notre Dame by 16 = 2 points UCLA’s blow-out of Arizona State was the best performance against a ranked team so far this season and was easily the best performance of the week. It was also the only game between ranked teams this week. Most of the other teams listed earned a handful of points by playing ranked teams close, or fairly close. None of the teams that had earned points this week had done so previously. West Viringia remains the only team to have earned points in more than one week. CUMULATIVE POINTS UCLA 46 Texas A& M 41 Oregon 38 Georgia 34 Virginia Tech 32 West Virginia 24 Boston College 23 Mississippi St. 23 South Carolina 23 Clemson 19 Oklahoma St. 19 Virginia 18 Washington St. 17 East Carolina 16 Louisiana St. 16 So. California 16 Kansas St. 15 Arkansas 14 Missouri 14 Indiana 12 Auburn 11 Tennessee 11 Texas 11 Florida St. 10 NC State 10 Stanford 9 Wisconsin 9 Memphis 8 Michigan St. 4 Navy 4 Washington 3 Florida 2 Iowa St. 2 Syracuse 2 San Diego St. 1 [/QUOTE]

Verification: What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?