Vs P5 only NCST vs Cuse Per Play Breakdown

[SUskibum]

NCST has 3 P5 games, like Cuse (yes their sos is higher vs P5, but its still probably more indicative than including G5 and FCS)

NCST Rushing Defense - 4.4 ypc allowed - rank 63 (vs P5 only)
Cuse Rushing Defense - 4.28 ypc allowed - rank 57 (vs P5 only)

NCST Passing Defense - 6.7 ypa allowed - rank 33 (vs P5 only)
Cuse Passing Defense - 6.6 ypa allowed - rank 27 (vs P5 only)

————————————————————————————-

NCST Rushing Offense - 3.14 ypc - rank 84 (vs P5 only)
Cuse Rushing Offense - 3.61 ypc - rank 69 (vs P5 only)

NCST Passing Offense - 5.6 ypa - rank 92 (vs P5 only)
Cuse Passing Offense - 7.9 ypa - rank 27 (vs P5 only)

 

[LeMoyneCuse]

Good stuff.

Really curious to see if the pull blocking we saw against Wagner is going to have an impact for the running back against a much, much, much better opponent.

 

[upperdeck]

If nothing else the added schemes we showed for Wagner require some extra prep for NC st. the lack of actual practice time in the bye week probably means we didnt add anything too new.

 

[SUskibum]

If we can get halfway back to where we were last year running (5 ypc - rank 14 vs P5) then we would have 3 out of 4 groups that are top 30 in per play and 1 group that is average (rush D).

I don’t have the exact numbers but anytime you are top 30 across ypp offense/defense for both rushing and throwing multiple (non related core categories) it often leads to a top 10-15 type record