Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SWC75, post: 837217, member: 289"] One thing I always wonder about is: Who won the weekend? Which college football team gave the best performance? I decided to look at the question with this system: (1) List the AP top 25 teams going into the weekend; (2) Give each of them points in reverse order of their ranking: 25 for #1, 24 for #2, etc.; (3) Give their opponent that number of points; (4) add the number of points the opponent beat them by or (5) subtract the number of points the opponent lost by. The net result is the number of points the opponents gets for their performance that week. I will keep track only of positive points as I’m trying to measure positive accomplishments, not discredit teams for negative ones. In the first week, Clemson played the #5 team , Georgia. They get 21 points for that. The beat them by 3 to push it to 24 points. Georgia played Clemson, the #8 team. They got 18 points for that. They lost by 3 and wound up with 15 points. A good performance doesn’t necessarily mean you won. Washington took on #19 Boise State, which gives then 7 points to start with. They won by the shocking score of 38-6 and wound up with 39 points, giving them the most impressive performance of the weekend. Lowly Buffalo came back from a 0-23 first quarter deficit against #2 Ohio State to get within 20-30 and then had a fumble recovery in front of the Ohio State goal line negated by a dubious penalty. They wound up losing by 20 but got 4 points out of it. There are two obvious problems here: you only get points if you played a ranked opponent: Buffalo could get points this weekend for playing Ohio State but Alabama could get none for playing an unranked Virginia Tech team. But I’m trying to measure exactly that: how did teams do against ranked opponents? Alabama will play more ranked opponents than Buffalo this year and they will wind up with a lot more points. The other problem is that the ranking of a team will change over the course of a season. Southern California started out ranked #1 last year and were still #2 when we played them fairly close. They tumbled to 7-6 and were unranked by the end of the season. But teams can change through injuries, poor response to frustrating losses, chemistry problems, they don’t like the coach, etc. They may have been a more formidable team when they were ranked. But I’m not going to offer this as an alternative ranking of teams, just as a statistic to look at when deciding where to rank teams. Here are the teams that earned positive points this week for their performance under this system: WEEK FIFTEEN Florida State beat #20 Duke by 38 = 44 points Stanford beat #11 Arizona State by 24 = 39 points Auburn beat #5 Missouri by 17 = 38 points Michigan State beat #2 Ohio State by 10 = 34 points Bowling Green beat #14 Northern Illinois by 20 = 32 points Oklahoma beat #6 Oklahoma State by 9 = 26 points Baylor beat #25 Texas by 20 = 21 points Ohio State lost to #10 Michigan State by 10 = 6 points Southern Methodist lost to #16 Central Florida by 4 = 6 points Missouri lost to #3 Auburn by 17 = 4 points CUMULATIVE TOTAL FOR SEASON Florida State 214 points Stanford 147 points Oklahoma State 110 points Auburn 108 points Alabama 107 points Louisiana State 92 points Missouri 90 points Georgia 83 points Oklahoma 68 points Arizona State 67 points Baylor 66 points Wisconsin 65 points Washington 63 points South Carolina 62 points Michigan State 62 points Mississippi 52 points UCLA 51 points Arizona 49 points Oregon 46 points Michigan 45 points Utah 37 points Duke 36 points Ohio State 36 points Virginia Tech 33 points Bowling Green 32 points Central Florida 32 points Tennessee 32 points Texas A&M 32 points Brigham Young 30 points Texas 30 points Texas Christian 30 points Penn State 29 points Clemson 26 points Kansas State 26 points Southern California 25 points West Virginia 25 points Oregon State 24 points Miami 21 points San Jose State 20 points Notre Dame 18 points Vanderbilt 18 points Boston College 17 points Minnesota 17 points Florida 16 points Wake Forest 16 points North Carolina 15 points Texas Tech 15 points Wisconsin 15 points Iowa 12 points Northwestern 12 points Akron 11 points Kentucky 11 points North Carolina State 11 points Pittsburgh 10 points Arkansas 9 points Connecticut 8 points Army 7 points Southern Methodist 6 points Wyoming 5 points Buffalo 4 points California 4 points Eastern Washington 4 points Maryland 4 points Rutgers 4 points Washington State 4 points South Florida 3 points Temple 3 points Mississippi State 1 point Comment: The test of a system of analysis is whether the right teams or players wind up at the top of the list. I once saw a list of the top baseball players of all time that listed Joe DiMaggio as #36 and Bobby Grich as #28. That didn’t make me question the value of Joe DiMaggio. It made me question the value of the system. At that I didn‘t offer this as a ranking system but rather as a statistic to be considered in ranking teams. The list suggests that Florida State is easily the best team in the country and I think they are. Stanford and Oklahoma State are very good teams that have done well against ranked teams but they both have a couple of losses so they won’t be playing for a title this year. Then comes Auburn and Alabama, clearly the next best teams. Auburn beat ‘Bama so they will be in the title game but I’m not sure they are better. An awful lot went their way to get them where they are. But that rushing attack is sure impressive. And it’s unconventional, which gives them an advantage. People complain about Florida State being in the weak ACC but Ohio State was in the weak Big Ten but look where they are on the list. I think we can be glad they didn’t make the big game. [/QUOTE]

Verification: What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?