Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CaptainJ, post: 3255021, member: 1553"] Yes, people will disagree, which is what exactly what I did. And I am relatively calm and settled, if I were talking my voice would not be raised and would be explaining this very slowly to try to help. And yes, samspann1 said things more than once that I clearly explained were not the case, literally in the post he was replying to...not hours ago, so there is no excuse. So technically(or in any sense), what you just wrote was dishonest, as a simple matter of fact(I'm not judging). If a word like inaccurate is more appealing, I suppose I can use that. I'm all for discussion if it is not disingenuous. I kind of wish Bees had answered the question of mine that illustrated the logic he was trying to set me up with after I put a lot of effort into replying to his posts, but apparently he realized it wasn't in his best interest to so do. But at least he didn't put words in my mouth, so I find his retreat honorable. [/QUOTE]