Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="elimunelson, post: 3923036, member: 615"] I mean to say we've underachieved for 30 years would completely dismiss the first 10 years of those 30 where we over achieved historically. From 91-01 we were a top 20 program in the country all things being equal. I feel like the arbitrary 30 years makes me question our status. If it was 20 years, i'd argue we are a top 5 underachieving program. Probably splitting hairs but I relish those first 10 and are the oasis on the horizon that a team in the northeast can become a consistent power [/QUOTE]