Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="SoBristol, post: 2490015, member: 485"]
That seems like the right metric -- how are we doing compared to BC.  I would add Pitt, Wake, and outside the ACC, Rutgers. 
At this point, you have to look to factors other than w/l.  Is the recruiting trending in the right direction?  Is Dino winning his share of head to head battles in landing recruits?  Is the staff (including S&C) what we want to see?  Is the roster improved compared to what Dino inherited?  Does Dino provide the face and tone to our program that we want to see, when he is interviewed & when he is featured at alumni events?  Is the program relatively free of disruptions, academic casualties, misadventures with the law?   In every category, Dino earns high marks (with the notable exception of the w/l record in November).

As for W/L, the roster and the two deep in particular looks stronger than any we have had, with the possible exception of 2012.  The QB position is solid and deeper than it has been.  The lines on both sides are better.  We have open questions at WR and LB, but we also have young, promising players in the ranks in those units.  So, Dino has set the table -- and good things will follow.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?