Add Central Florida (Orlando) and Houston (Houston, TX) thereby increasing its eyeball count substantially.
Go to ESPN and make a TV deal now.
Increase the withdrawal fee.
And allow Pitt and SU to leave now for $10 million.
Well, there's no place to go.who's going to agree to increase the withdrawal fee when everybody wants to leave?
Well, there's no place to go.
WVU tried and failed with the ACC and SEC.
It seems that the ACC will not increase to 16 teams now that the Pac 12 has capped its membership and the Big 12 will apparently survive.
Television is the controlling force. By adding C Florida and Houston along with TCU, the BE can boast of some pretty decent TV markets with plenty of eyeballs.
Nope.Add UCF, Memphis, Houston, and East Carolina. Rename itself 'ConferenceUSA'.
Nope.
The Big East brand is too strong.
Memphis - maybe - decent TV market.
Well, there's no place to go.
WVU tried and failed with the ACC and SEC.
It seems that the ACC will not increase to 16 teams now that the Pac 12 has capped its membership and the Big 12 will apparently survive.
Television is the controlling force. By adding C Florida and Houston along with TCU, the BE can boast of some pretty decent TV markets with plenty of eyeballs.
The Big12 is at 8 (Big 8???) ... I'm sure they would take WV, Louisville, and Cinci in a heartbeat.
The Big 12 is an issue.The Big12 is at 8 (Big 8???) ... I'm sure they would take WV, Louisville, and Cinci in a heartbeat.
The Big 12 is an issue.
The Big East has to take action now to thwart a Big 12 raid or it will die as football conference.
Hence, my suggestion - create a solid TV audience - get the TV contract and create stability.
And . . . . . ?The NCAA says a conference needs a minimum of 8 teams to be recognized, but there's no maximum. If all the conferences could be capped at 12 or 14, and TV money could be regulated, there would be stability simply because there would be no place for anyone to go.
As long as there are open slots in the power conferences, there will always be unrest, and the BE will be vulnerable to another raid.
The last time there was stability in college football was the 80's, when the CFA controlled ALL the TV money, conferences were satisfied with only 8-10 members, and you could thrive as an independent.
And . . . . . ?
Right.If I had the answer, I'd volunteer to be commish.
The BE needs to add more football teams, but there really aren't any sexy names left. And the basketball schools will still argue against expansion.
If the ACC wants two more schools, UConn and Rutgers won't think twice. Same with the Big12.
In the mean time ... grab the best CUSA teams you can find and hang on.
IMO it's just postponing the inevitable. Just get the 5 superconference deal over with, and the BE can go back to being what Gavitt intended ... an eastern basketball conference devoid of any football influence.
Who else is there? They're down to 7 teams with TCU, who else is there to add?
Any program that wants a chance at an automatic BCS bid and a chance to play in the best college BB conference in the USA.That's why I brought U at Buffalo earlier today. I do not see much out there for them to add. The service academies would be nice. But realistically who wants to join the BE?
I don't want UConn or Rutgers in the ACC.Now that SU and Pitt are leaving, perhaps the best thing is for the BE football schools to find new homes, i.e. TCU, South Florida, WVU, Cincinnati & Louisville to the Big 12 with UConn & Rutgers to the ACC. The Big 12 would be stronger for the change and the Big East can return to being a very good basketball league...not a bad thing.
I think you're focusing on the wrong criteria.If you keep replacing BE teams with CUSA teams, sooner or later you'll be CUSA.