Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Townie72, post: 2346276, member: 780"]
Contrary to what you maintain, it has everything to do with if the courses were available to the student body at large. Not "Zero" as you maintain, but everything.

Given the fact that these courses were not a special benefit for athletes only, exactly what rule is it that UNC broke?

[B]What rule is it that the NCAA failed to enforce?[/B]

I don't think there is an "Too Easy Course" rule.

Are we now going to have minimums on the "levels' or the difficulty of college classes offered? From the descriptions, the UNC were ridiculously easy and required little work. But where do we draw the line?

Everybody that went to college knows there are hard courses and easy ones. Everybody ought to know that the courses at Duke are generally taught at a higher level than they are at Louisville.

People can do their best Rumplestiltskin or Yosemite Sam imitations and jump up and down and complain about the unfairness of this in their eyes and sputter inindignation.

But apparently UNC didn't break any rules. The NCAA did not fail to enforce any rules.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?