Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="TheCusian, post: 4083601, member: 2585"]
He did!

We beat a ranked team the first two seasons (#2 Clemson!) and then followed that up with a 10 win season. That's 3 years of steady improvement and no one fires their HC in any of those three years (esp following the three prior). We did what most everyone would do and re-upped him to a better deal based on his performance thus far. 2019 was a disappointment, but we just re-upped him. 2020 was a weird year financially, leadership-wise, public/student health wise and resulted in a weird one-off schedule. No one should fire the HC after all that.

2021 is the first year where a real case could be made. But the case isn't clear cut. A heisman level RB and a string of 3 losses by 3 muddies the narrative.

</automated message>

People who use big w/l data points should be obligated to go through and decide when in the timeline they'd have done something different. If it's 2020 - you're cruel and maybe a silly person. If it's 2021? Ok - I think that's fair. But you've just disagreed with a very recent decision by the sitting AD. Not 6 years of a problem like you portrayed.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?