Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Jake, post: 1317391, member: 86"] Mine did. I either prorated the assists over 40 minutes, or discounted Sherman's Freshman year in my steals per game. Pearl sure got a lot of steals per game for someone who "didn't play a lick of defense." You undersold pearls abilities, exaggerated his shortcomings to fit your perspective. I think it's a very debatable argument...I have no problem with people who prefer Sherm. You don't think its worth a debate because essentially Pearl was a lazy, flashy player who didn't play a lick of defense and created more for himself than other players. Those are all your words, not mine. [/QUOTE]