Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="ivorytower, post: 3919546, member: 6888"]
The reality is that we aren't replacing a third attackman but fifth year  Refhuss who was the AA straw that stirred the drink. His production could only be replaced by top layer of talents in the portal and they are off the board. Can only hold out hope of a late transfer of significant talent.

Seebold did a very good job replacing Scanlan for four games but ...the production of the exiled one wont be matched whatever we think of the former persona or limitations of game

Corsi's tape impressed but he's  not even listed in the IL Power 100. Every situation is different but the other ACC teams bring in attackman rated as  first, fourth, eight n 14th  overall recruits and none will be rushed into lineups despite talents because there is a jump.

In 2020 , Cuse was mid centric with offense initiated up top . In 2021, Cuse was attack centric with the emergence of Refhuss and Hiltz.

Do not envision Cuse attack being as statistically productive no matter who are third/ fourth attackman.

Believe offensive success will boil down to rebound by Curry and Dordevic as well as balance  and coordination between  midfield and attack. Intangibles are always hard to quantify but should be identified in fall.

Quiet off season is somewhat disconcerting . Hope 2022 is played not to experiment but to win.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?