Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="CuSeLaX, post: 3053033, member: 6273"]
You make a lot of good points about Tucker’s first year and some struggles he had down the stretch. I understand what you mean when you say Cook wasn’t afforded the opportunity to play Attack exclusively as Tucker was in the midfield. However my larger point is that Tucker is a better player than Cook. We can’t say that much of anything Cook put on tape last year was impressive. So placing him in that third spot is purely projection of great improvement. While placing Tucker there isn’t projection because he already showed he deserves to be a starter. Would it not be smarter to have Cook as the 4th attackman and have Buttermore on the first line instead of the second? Going off tape Cook Was not a better offensive player than any of the starters as well as Buttermore and in reality Dearth. I’m making my decision based off watching every game Cook and Tucker played. However I fee anyone who says Cook should start is only making that call projecting a leap without any college tape to back up the choice. I don’t doubt that Cook can be good I just don’t see him being better than Tucker or any of the first line middies.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?