Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Who wouldn't want to play QB or WR here?
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="RF2044, post: 1903175, member: 40"] [U]MY[/U] initial assertion is that OL has been a trouble spot for our program dating back for 20+ years, which is 100% true. When we were recruiting Chad Mavety a couple of years ago, one of the Rutgers OL who was in the NFL poked fun of him having SU on his list. Paraphrasing: "why would you go there? they don't put anybody in the NFL" That was pre-Pugh getting drafted, and reflected the perception of the talent we were fielding. Not only have we lacked talent at OL dating back to the P era, we've also placed very few of them at the next level. Not that having NFL prospects is the end all be all, but it suggests something about the players [considered in aggregate] that we've marched out there for the last two decades. You referenced Chibane and Trudo. Nothing against either of those guys, but both were players who saw the field early and showed a lot of potential, but also plateaued early. Bringing them up again demonstrates that you don't see the forest through the trees re: the most important factor: those were perfectly serviceable players, but they weren't as good as the guys our peer programs were playing on THEIR offensive lines, and they certainly weren't NFL caliber talents. How many OL has a peer program like BC put in the NFL over the last 20 years? How about Pitt? Now, compare that to the paltry list of names you're bringing up. Also, I shouldn't have to explain this, but we play [U]5 offensive lineman at the same time[/U]. 1 stud can certainly improve the play of the entire unit [a la Pugh in 2012], but the fact remains that most years we haven't had that stud, and often were only fielding 2-3 OL that would even be in the rotations of many of our opponents. So for all of the rationalizing you've done referencing the Chibane's and Trudo's, the fact is that our OLs have generally trended from god awful to decidedly subpar, far beyond the memory of players like Chad Mavety when we recruited him. OL has been a systemic problem at SU for a LONG time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Who wouldn't want to play QB or WR here?
Top
Bottom