Why Syracuse Will Win | Syracusefan.com

Why Syracuse Will Win

SWC75

Bored Historian
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
34,529
Like
67,226
- Clemson’s scores this year have been 19-13, 30-24, 59-0, 26-7, 42-36, 56-10, 24-17OT, 37-34. The two blow-outs have come against South Carolina State and Boston College. The 30-24 win was over Troy, (admittedly their only loss). The OT game was against NC State at home. This team has not been a juggernaut. For the most part, they have just gotten the job done. They remind me of Florida State in 2014- the year after their great year. They had the same players but weren’t the same year. In fact, let’s roll it back to Syracuse 1960. Same thing. The talent was there but not the magic. It’s hard to maintain effort and focus at a high level for a long time. This Clemson team really hasn’t shown that they are doing ti. Somebody’s going to knock them off. Why not us?

- The last two Syracuse-Clemson games have been ten point games. And they were legitimate ten point games. Two years ago we had one of the best defenses in the country but nobody knew it because we had one of the worst offenses. We led at halftime, 6-3. It was 6-9 going into the fourth quarter, all field goals. They tacked on a touchdown and we couldn’t’ answer. We were out-gained 170-375. Turnovers were 3-4. We gained 408 yards on Riley Dixon’s 9 punts, 161 more than they got on 6 punts. All we did was hang in there but we did do that.

- Last year Dungey was out again and Zach Mahoney had to take the field against a top ten team for the second time, Again we were out-gained 322-570 because we couldn’t pass. We out-rushed them 242-202 but were out-passed 80-368. Nonetheless , the game was a back and fourth game that was in doubt the whole way. Clemson did jump out to an early lead, 0-14 but we weren’t fazed. We came back to tie it up, then feel behind by two TDs again, and came back twice to within one score. And Clemson wasn’t looking past anybody: they were trying to win a national championship. When you are doing that, every game is huge.

- We can pass now. Three Clemson defensive backs were injured vs. Florida State. From Campus Insiders: “Safety Jadar Johnson (calf), cornerback Marcus Edmond (toe) and cornerback Trayvon Mullen (ankle) all have nagging injuries that aren’t considered serious. But the ‘Cuse plays fast, so we’ll see how well the entire defense—specifically the secondary—holds up for the Tigers.” If we can protect Dungey or if he can scramble away, we might be able to do some business.

- The Tigers have a top NFL prospect at cornerback in Cordea Tangkersley. Why is that on our side? Because it might make Dabo Sweeney think that he can covers Amba Etta Tawo with one guy. Remember when Connecticut did that?

- DeShaun Watson has 22 TD passes but he’s thrown 10 interceptions in 301 attempts, 1 every 30 attempts. Eric Dungey has thrown 6 interceptions in 346 attempts, (1 in 58). A couple of pics could brighten the ‘Cuse’s picture for this game.

- Does Brisley have another big moment in him?

4-4 with 4+ to go!

LET’S GO ORANGE!!!!
 
Breakout game for the Orange, every facet, every player. Nothing to lose, the world to gain.
 

hqdefault.jpg
 
- Clemson’s scores this year have been 19-13, 30-24, 59-0, 26-7, 42-36, 56-10, 24-17OT, 37-34. The two blow-outs have come against South Carolina State and Boston College. The 30-24 win was over Troy, (admittedly their only loss). The OT game was against NC State at home. This team has not been a juggernaut. For the most part, they have just gotten the job done. They remind me of Florida State in 2014- the year after their great year. They had the same players but weren’t the same year. In fact, let’s roll it back to Syracuse 1960. Same thing. The talent was there but not the magic. It’s hard to maintain effort and focus at a high level for a long time. This Clemson team really hasn’t shown that they are doing ti. Somebody’s going to knock them off. Why not us?

- The last two Syracuse-Clemson games have been ten point games. And they were legitimate ten point games. Two years ago we had one of the best defenses in the country but nobody knew it because we had one of the worst offenses. We led at halftime, 6-3. It was 6-9 going into the fourth quarter, all field goals. They tacked on a touchdown and we couldn’t’ answer. We were out-gained 170-375. Turnovers were 3-4. We gained 408 yards on Riley Dixon’s 9 punts, 161 more than they got on 6 punts. All we did was hang in there but we did do that.

- Last year Dungey was out again and Zach Mahoney had to take the field against a top ten team for the second time, Again we were out-gained 322-570 because we couldn’t pass. We out-rushed them 242-202 but were out-passed 80-368. Nonetheless , the game was a back and fourth game that was in doubt the whole way. Clemson did jump out to an early lead, 0-14 but we weren’t fazed. We came back to tie it up, then feel behind by two TDs again, and came back twice to within one score. And Clemson wasn’t looking past anybody: they were trying to win a national championship. When you are doing that, every game is huge.

- We can pass now. Three Clemson defensive backs were injured vs. Florida State. From Campus Insiders: “Safety Jadar Johnson (calf), cornerback Marcus Edmond (toe) and cornerback Trayvon Mullen (ankle) all have nagging injuries that aren’t considered serious. But the ‘Cuse plays fast, so we’ll see how well the entire defense—specifically the secondary—holds up for the Tigers.” If we can protect Dungey or if he can scramble away, we might be able to do some business.

- The Tigers have a top NFL prospect at cornerback in Cordea Tangkersley. Why is that on our side? Because it might make Dabo Sweeney think that he can covers Amba Etta Tawo with one guy. Remember when Connecticut did that?

- DeShaun Watson has 22 TD passes but he’s thrown 10 interceptions in 301 attempts, 1 every 30 attempts. Eric Dungey has thrown 6 interceptions in 346 attempts, (1 in 58). A couple of pics could brighten the ‘Cuse’s picture for this game.

- Does Brisley have another big moment in him?

4-4 with 4+ to go!

LET’S GO ORANGE!!!!
We have already shown that we can beat a top 20 team if we are running on most cylinders. I am sure we would take down Clemson if we were hitting on ALL cylinders (minimal missed assignments, win the TO battle, limit penalties, win special teams convincingly)

A term we haven't heard lately is "Clemsoning" and think this team might be one that is well suited to a week that doesn't make sense but happens anyways!

Our team is has still not hung 50 on anyone, but the week that our offense clicks, we definitely will and the opponent won't matter. The clock is ticking... tick, tick, tick

Our non-offensive scores have not been limited this year, but some week we are going to get ours, and if this is the week it could go a long way towards the points necessary to win.
 
My biggest concern, their D: Clemson has 31 sacks. That's #3 in the nation behind Alabama. Will Dungey have time to throw? Another problem: teams only have a 50% completion rate against them. The longest pass play this season against them is only 43 yards. They've allowed only 5 TD passes in 8 games. However, Jabar Johnson (4 pics) is questionable.

Can we pose a running game that keeps them honest? I think we're going to find out how good our offense really is. I go into every game assuming we'll find a way to score 27 points. This one might be different.

Meanwhile, nobody's scored over 28 points on us in 4 weeks. Plus we have Hudson back. I'm not as concerned about their offense. Though I am very curious to see how we do against them.

Bettors have brought the betting line down a point or two. It's still 26 to 27. I think that's high. As much as I'd love to believe we can catch them napping, it's on ABC and the more recent game film on us will get their attention. I think this is a 32 - 16 game. Relatively low scoring.
 
I agree with SUskibum - Clemsoning is the word of the game. It does nothing for our players but strikes terror in the hearts of Clemson fans and players. They know it is there inside them but never know when it will emerge ... is Saturday the day they are their own worst enemy, again and again and again?
 
WHY SU MIGHT WIN:

*Clemson might get tricked into eating bad oysters the night before the game.
*Random chance
*Clemson might get lost and miss the game and/or forget that there's a game
 
I agree with SUskibum - Clemsoning is the word of the game. It does nothing for our players but strikes terror in the hearts of Clemson fans and players. They know it is there inside them but never know when it will emerge ... is Saturday the day they are their own worst enemy, again and again and again?
I don't know what this means. Does clemsoning mean losing a game? We've won 43 straight against unranked opponents so that can't be it. I'm just unsure how this term keeps getting brought up.
 
I don't know what this means. Does clemsoning mean losing a game? We've won 43 straight against unranked opponents so that can't be it. I'm just unsure how this term keeps getting brought up.

"Clemsoning" refers to losing a game Clemson has no business losing. Ranked or unranked is immaterial.
 
"Clemsoning" refers to losing a game Clemson has no business losing. Ranked or unranked is immaterial.


In other words a W T loss- like the ones we kept complaining about in the Pasqualoni era. I guess it was "Syracuseing" back them.

Maybe someday we'll be good enough to have W T losses again.
 
Last edited:
Inother words a What loss- like the ones we kept complaining about in the Pasqualoni era. I guess it was "Syracuseing" back them.

Maybe someday we'll be good enough to have What losses again.


Under HCDB, I don't think there will be many. If a team beats us, they will have earned it, the Orange will not have FUBAR'd.
 
Under HCDB, I don't think there will be many. If a team beats us, they will have earned it, the Orange will not have FUBAR'd.

Wake Forest game this year...yes we werent expected to win that game but we should have been a lot better and should have been a lot closer than it was.
 
Wake Forest game this year...yes we werent expected to win that game but we should have been a lot better and should have been a lot closer than it was.

Coaches do not control the weather. HCDB and staff could have called a different game, but the team was and still is in the developmental stage.

A real "What the &^%?" game has no circumstances that are not in the coach's control; sidelined star, adverse weather, tragedy, etc. Basically, no excuse for losing, thus, "What the &^%#?"
 
"Clemsoning" refers to losing a game Clemson has no business losing. Ranked or unranked is immaterial.
I have no idea how this narrative is still alive...
 
Last edited:
clemson was going down late last game when the seminoles were driving into easy field goal range and then committed back to back O-line penalties.
we can't play doofus ball again with silly penalties . we're not good enuf to shoot ourselves in the foot and then hobble over the finish line.
 
Why Syracuse will win
  • They didn't look into your heart.
  • They didn't look into his heart.
  • They didn't look into my heart.
  • They didn't know.
 
I don't know what this means. Does clemsoning mean losing a game? We've won 43 straight against unranked opponents so that can't be it. I'm just unsure how this term keeps getting brought up.
You have a good point. That term applies more to the Bowden era. Clemson is great right now, and you will stay great until Dabo has a mental breakdown (which will happen), but heaven knows I hate Clemson. I honestly think that you're the best school in the nation to do the least. I'm going off on a tangent now, but you're fighting to be a top 20 program, yet Clemson fans act like you're elite. That drives me crazy.

And if you don't believe me, in no particular order, I have a very hard time seeing Clemson over:
1. Michigan
2. Ohio State
3. Penn State
4. Notre Dame
5. FSU
6. Auburn
7. Florida
8. Georgia
9. Auburn
10. Alabama
11. LSU
12. Miami (FL)
13. Texas
14. Nebraska
15. Oklahoma
16. USC
17. Texas A&M (arguably)
18. Pitt (arguably if you weight history heavily - otherwise take your pick out of Stanford, Oregon, and Wisconsin)
 
You have a good point. That term applies more to the Bowden era. Clemson is great right now, and you will stay great until Dabo has a mental breakdown (which will happen), but heaven knows I hate Clemson. I honestly think that you're the best school in the nation to do the least. I'm going off on a tangent now, but you're fighting to be a top 20 program, yet Clemson fans act like you're elite. That drives me crazy.

And if you don't believe me, in no particular order, I have a very hard time seeing Clemson over:
1. Michigan
2. Ohio State
3. Penn State
4. Notre Dame
5. FSU
6. Auburn
7. Florida
8. Georgia
9. Auburn
10. Alabama
11. LSU
12. Miami (FL)
13. Texas
14. Nebraska
15. Oklahoma
16. USC
17. Texas A&M (arguably)
18. Pitt (arguably if you weight history heavily - otherwise take your pick out of Stanford, Oregon, and Wisconsin)
You've got auburn listed twice also why are you talking about history? Clemson fans know that those teams have more history than we do but we've been more consistent than all of them minus Alabama.

Best school to do the least??? Have you seen Georgia. What are you even arguing here?
 
You've got auburn listed twice also why are you talking about history? Clemson fans know that those teams have more history than we do but we've been more consistent than all of them minus Alabama.

Best school to do the least??? Have you seen Georgia. What are you even arguing here?
1. Good catch on Auburn. I meant to say Tennessee for one of them.
2. No, you haven't (hence the word "Clemsoning"), and your post is the kind of irritating delusion that I'm talking about. Yes, you're better now, but Clemson is far from consistent.
3. Clemson claimed NC's =1, Heismans = 0; UGA claimed NC's = 2, Heismans =2. Yup. You sure showed them.
 
1. Good catch on Auburn. I meant to say Tennessee for one of them.
2. No, you haven't (hence the word "Clemsoning"), and your post is the kind of irritating delusion that I'm talking about. Yes, you're better now, but Clemson is far from consistent.
3. Clemson claimed NC's =1, Heismans = 0; UGA claimed NC's = 2, Heismans =2. Yup. You sure showed them.
Wow you got me. Not looking to get into a pointless pissing match with you as I am a guest on this board, but I think you're reaching.
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
172,292
Messages
5,008,181
Members
6,025
Latest member
Upstate33

Online statistics

Members online
204
Guests online
2,811
Total visitors
3,015


...
Top Bottom