Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="pokercuse08, post: 5151747, member: 6535"]
Plus, if you go no huddle with no subs and force them to adjust on the fly with the personnel they have, they might drop a safety down to help out - thus opening things up over the top for the WRs you keep on the field.

And regarding the play you drew up and matchups you talked about, one of the cool things about this is that it can also open up the run game - which is why I like going 2 RB, 2 TE, 1 WR. If their LBs can't cover our RB, then they may counter by going lighter the next time we run the package out. So maybe they're in nickel or dime, now we run it down their throats with 2 TE and 2 RB. If they keep 3 LB on the field, well, good luck covering.

As much as we're talking about the RB here, a big part of this is also the versatility of OG and Villari. Of course with Villari you can basically consider him like an H back and go 1 RB, 2 TE, 2 WR. Villari can line up at TE, split out, in the backfield as a lead blocker, or in the backfield to be a ball carrier.

Essentially there are a few combinations of personnel packages that we can use that can actually line up in several different formations and ask a defense a lot of questions related to the versatility of THEIR personnel.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?