Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="liljoe, post: 58872, member: 1071"] I can see it working for everyone else but Syracuse and Pitt. SU and Pitt have no claim of a breach on contract or unreasonable burden in staying. They caused this decline (through legitimate means- the Claus isallowing which is accepting the possibility of schools leaving). It would be like stealing from a Wendy's restaurant (fine take out dining), and by the time you go on trial it's changed to a taco bell, and thus arguing you shouldn't be found guilty because taco bell sucks and you would have stolen from it. [/QUOTE]