Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="jncuse, post: 3874647, member: 1969"]
In terms of the other WWE / A&E documentaries I liked most of them as well.   The only one I did not like was the Randy Savage one - that one just got off track.

My favourite one was the Mick Foley one.   His story has been communicated in many mediums so many times so there is a risk that it could be a miss, but it wasn't. He is such a great interview, interesting and decent person, and they did a really good job with it.   It seemed the most honest as well.  Others sometimes had to skew presentation to fit a narrative -- not for Mick   Liked the perspective from his kids as well.

The Austin one was not really not that informative, but it left me feeling good afterwards.  So thumbs up.

Piper was good because I didn't know that much about his younger days including his roots in Canada, and really liked the family involvement from his kids.   Booker T was also a different angle of attack that I liked.

Getting back to the Randy Savage one.   It was just a very poorly done documentary in my view that left you wondering what exactly was the conclusion they were trying to make about this man.   It flowed up and down.
- Way too many random characters speaking.
- Way too much Bubba the Love Sponge.  The post 2002 feud between Hogan was really not that relevant and yet it was a major focus of the documentary.
- Not enough content on certain elements of his WWE career even if that stuff is largely known.
- Way too much focus on certain non relevant items.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?