Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="jncuse, post: 3934242, member: 1969"]
Well the WWE may change their mind on that -- how many times have they have they unified the two titles since the WCW acquisition.    At least twice that I can remember.   And then they change their mind shortly thereafter.

I do agree that they have to find a way to emphasize the IC Title.   The thing is however if you watch matches on PPV there are a number of matches that have good wrestling and could meet the threshold of "IC quality matches".   They have the workers to make it work -- but not the writing.

I am actually fine with the concept of two brands of rosters and each having a champion. 
Yes things are running dry right now in terms of valid opponents -- but I blame that on them not being able to create content and contenders and not that there are two title holders.

As I said, at least at the PPV level (and somewhat regular TV) the title match content has a passing grade.   If you take one of them away the TV content will be even crappier -- although I am not sure if they can go any further down in terms of "crap".
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?