Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="jncuse, post: 3934280, member: 1969"]
I used to argue that the 3rd hour of RAW really hurt the product, and they could produce so much better with only 2 hours (and that was based on Smackdown being a decent product until recently).

Now I would simply argue that whether the show is 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours or 4 hours or 12 hours the content will be unbearable.    My WWE viewing for the most part is now this:
- Do not watch Raw or SmackDown
- Watch the PPV pre-shows (which I never did) so I can understand what happened in the past month.
- Watch the PPV's which for the most part have been OK (maybe not S'Slam(
- Listen to Post Wrestling and SNME Podcasts talk about Raw / Smackdown when I walk/bike, which they usually torch but not always.   I actually enjoy listening to people talk about wrestling than watching it right now.

If the writing improves, I personally think a 2/2/1 format would make sense.  As I said Smackdown written in WWE style was bearable until recently.   Create some 1 hour "supershow" each week with one big match.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?