Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="jncuse, post: 4958919, member: 1969"]
Here is an excellent podcast I listened to on the topic yesterday - and the NDA discussion was part of it when they brought in a legal expert.   Pollock and Thurston are a good listen in general.

[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.postwrestling.com/2024/01/31/live-at-1-p-m-et-legal-implications-of-vince-mcmahon-lawsuit-post-x-wrestlenomics/[/URL]

The Legal Expert had similar talking points to your article - and its possible the law could go both ways on some of these NDA's...  NDA's that point out clear sexual misconduct or crimes will be voided.     But the broad ones - its more debatable.     Who knows what is in some of those old NDA's that are all paid.

The interesting thing with this NDA with Jenel Grant is that its possible the judge could have looked at the broad terms, and said unfortunately it can't be voided for that reason... but it could be for another reason.   Because the entitled idiot didn't pay the $3M.    It would be an extra cherry on the top, if its his ego over a measly $2 million (for him) that is the only reason he could be taken down on this NDA.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?