Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 4958928, member: 1969"] This is another interesting point that I had never really thought of before. Vince might be ruled to be protected by some/all of the NDAs, but the WWE may not be And ultimately the WWE is responsible for actions of their employees (Vince), while acting as employees . The NDA's were paid by Vince, and never signed by someone acting in a WWE capacity, and this how they were hidden. So how can the WWE be protected if they never signed them? [MEDIA=twitter]1753502135772180578[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]