Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="pfister1, post: 1992098, member: 285"] I'm with the prior poster. Obviously a title would be better than a final four, but the final four has a significant amount of cache attached to it. In reality success is measured by your performance in the tournament. Getting to a final four offsets a lot. We don't win many arguments with other fan bases flexing our muscles on the basis of having more 20 win seasons than they do. 2010 was a lot of fun, but in the end it sucked because what might have been one of our best teams all time under achieved in the tournament. Same with '88, '89, '91, '12 I would to have the team go undefeated in the regular season, win the conference tournament and then win the NCAA tournament. But it's never happened for us and isn't likely to. So knowing your aren't likely to achieve all 3 you have to prioritize; and success in the NCAA tournament is the top priority. [/QUOTE]