I heard an ESPN radio host observe that Charlie Strong got the Texas job because he had a QB - Teddy Bridgewater, and that Mack Brown lost the Texas job because he could never replace Colt McCoy.
So true.
Well if the Hunt we got for the BC game is who we get consistently next year (or even better dare we hope...) We will be competitive in more ACC games next season. We probably still won't be competing with FSU and Clemson, but we sure shouldnt be blown out by the likes of Georgia Tech
Texas should be able to recruit an adequate quarterback. Texas defense was the problem and they got Greg Robinson. Go figure.I heard an ESPN radio host observe that Charlie Strong got the Texas job because he had a QB - Teddy Bridgewater, and that Mack Brown lost the Texas job because he could never replace Colt McCoy.
So true.
Texas should be able to recruit an adequate quarterback. Texas defense was the problem and they got Greg Robinson. Go figure.
Preach Charlie!I heard an ESPN radio host observe that Charlie Strong got the Texas job because he had a QB - Teddy Bridgewater, and that Mack Brown lost the Texas job because he could never replace Colt McCoy.
So true.
Texas was pretty crappy when he took over and he was a disaster at MichiganI know Robinson was a poor head coach for us but it was widely acknowledged that he vastly improved Texas' defense after he took over about three or four games in.
Mack should have returned one of Winston's phone calls.
Texas was pretty crappy when he took over and he was a disaster at Michigan
I know Robinson was a poor head coach for us but it was widely acknowledged that he vastly improved Texas' defense after he took over about three or four games in.
Texas was pretty crappy when he took over and he was a disaster at Michigan
You are so right OPA and it's interesting when schools get the wrong type of qb for their system because he was rated highly or they just didn't do their job of evaluating correctly. Sometimes a coach just happens to get lucky as heck and one falls into his lap and looking at the NFL rosters you see many qb's that were not from the selector teams schools...heck OSU and PSU still haven't found a qb to put into the NFL that has had success in many many years.
The qb is extremely important when you don't have the proverbial 5 star talent around him. There are some schools that just need an efficient game manager that can put the ball into the playmakers hands and has a heck of an offensive line to help him. But with some, you need that extra talent from the qb to do the extra things when the talent surrounding him isn't of the highest quality.
Oh and to add...I believe Bridgwater fell into Strongs lap only when Miami got into a lot of trouble. May be wrong but that's what this old guys brain is telling him.
Regression to the mean. They ended up average. The law of averages says they were going to balance the early season terribleness irrespective of coach. Just saying...I know Robinson was a poor head coach for us but it was widely acknowledged that he vastly improved Texas' defense after he took over about three or four games in.
Regression to the mean. They ended up average. The law of averages says they were going to balance the early season terribleness irrespective of coach. Just saying...
Bridgewater decommitted from Miami after Randy Shannon was fired.
He was fine but it's just math. They weren't going to be that horrid with that much talent every game. The same reason we don't panic if a team hits their first few threes against us in basketball. It will revert to closer to the mean by the end. If a team like unc loses a ton of games to start the year, it will tend to balance to their talent level. It's just a statistical truism.No.
Robinsion transformed the Texas defense.
Even at the end it was the offense that hurt the program - I am pretty sure the offense gave up a bunch of TDs.
Robinson did an undeniably good job this fall in Austin.
He was fine but it's just math. They weren't going to be that horrid with that much talent every game. The same reason we don't panic if a team hits their first few threes against us in basketball. It will revert to closer to the mean by the end. If a team like unc loses a ton of games to start the year, it will tend to balance to their talent level. It's just a statistical truism.
No, not at all. It's saying that a talented student with a track record of Bs who gets some Ds is likely to balance that with some high grades to net out at the B that defines their track record.That's like saying that a D student in 9th grade will probably be a B- student by his senior year - because of reversion to the mean. By the same logic every team in college football should have a long-term track record of .500.