Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="tep624, post: 508398, member: 430"]
Zach Allen is getting a bump, ironically right after Clemson, K St, TCU, and Ok St offered him 3 weeks before signing day.
 
Gus Edwards was listed on Rivals for over a year as a RB.  He commits to Syracuse, as a RB, and is still listed as a RB.  FSU offers him as a fullback 2 months ago, and instantly he's now reflected and ranked as a FB, simply because FSU offered him at that position. 
 
Is Zach Allen any better or worse a recruit the day before he received those offers?  Should Gus Edwards be ranked as a FB simply because 1 school is recruiting him at that position, whereas the other 20 were recruiting him as a tailback/linebacker, including the one he's committed to?
 
The problem with the recruiting sites isn't the top 250 recruits - there's too much exposure there to pull too much BS.  It's the 2/3 star recruits, and since that's where we tend to play, it leads to a lot of frustration.  The big school/site analysts have far too much ability to influence that level of recruit, and often it's based upon nothing other than bias towards whatever site they cater to.  MF was public enemy #1 in that respect for a long time.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?