RF2044
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 30,626
- Like
- 98,715
I think it's a higher floor lower ceiling hire.
Agree 100%.
I think it's a higher floor lower ceiling hire.
I think it's a higher floor lower ceiling hire.
I lived in Bayside for a few years... Hmmmm.
Yep.I think it's a higher floor lower ceiling hire.
True but I wasn't being facetious there.Clicking ignore takes less time than posting a retort.
So where does Prof. Griff fit in the hierarchy? Red is the new Hop, is Gerry is the new Red? Is Griff the new Gerry?
????????? do you KNOW none of the FOUR staff was out there? Except maybe on Christmas or their wife or kids' birthdays? Then yeah, priorities.I guess my question would be does it matter if you can only have 2 on the road instead of 4 when more often than not nobody from the staff is out there?
You're trying to make excuses for the staff but are uninformed. Literally within 48 hours of the interview/story running we went to visit him at his school and tried very hard to get him to visit the campus again but he declined and committed to Miami shortly thereafter. We did not cool on Lonnie Walker.
We dropped the ball. No other way to spin it no matter how hard you try.
I think with Kaleb it was about being thrust into a role that he or the team wasn't expecting him to have. He lost confidence and never recovered. I thought he would be a good player. I think Ron Patterson and Chino were both mistakes but mistakes happen. I agree recruiting is about projecting and that is an inexact science. I have to do that for my work and can sympathize. I personally liked Brunson, Newton and Morris a lot and I feel like many other posters did as well so that is why I brought them up. If we had made the mistake with Morris and gotten another good PG it wouldn't have been as much of an issue.I have to say that unless you are one of the REALLY big schools, with shall we say CERTAIN REPUTATIONS for not being frugal, almost every school and its fan base will complain about the recruits who disappointed them. It's just the nature of recruiting and even the big schools have kids who transferred because they were promised they would start by say sophomore year but they barely got off the bench that year because they were recruited over.
As for BJ Johnson and Ron Patterson, they were victims of the scholarship debacle. BJ had a very good year at his A-10 school and that's a tough league to play in. Ron Patterson may or may not have made a leap if he had been able to stay on the team. And Kaleb wasn't expecting to be our starting PG as a freshman, but his predecessor was drafted in the first round so Kaleb did his best. That he didn't improve in his sophomore year might have been in part due to the fatigue level of playing 35 minutes a game when you should have been playing 10-15 minutes. You don't necessarily get a chance to rest in the summer because you have to play in leagues or you get rusty.
That's my instant analysis without getting to the recruiting board. Feel free to rebut my points.
????????? do you KNOW none of the FOUR staff was out there? Except maybe on Christmas or their wife or kids' birthdays? Then yeah, priorities.
That's a real head scratcher of a question
Replace insurance policies with Burdick cars and that pretty much describes the Gerry hire.It's not like AG was selling insurance policies and JB all of sudden called him up and asked if he was interested in coaching.
Replace insurance policies with Burdick cars and that pretty much describes the Gerry hire.
I agree that Coleman has good players around him but I think he is a good player as well. I have seen him play on TV multiple times and watched entire games. My thoughts aren't solely based on highlight reels.Quade wants to be a pro and thinks Kentucky will make his route easier.
Oak Hill is on TV a few times a year (in fact they were on ESPN this week) and we shall see regarding Coleman. I know Coleman hopes your right. To me Coleman is a kid who benefited from playing alongside good players and a class where there was a significant drop in the ability of the 6th and 7th point guard.
This is probably true but I think it is also that people who are frustrating with the regional recruiting and some of the swing and misses are using Gerry as the target for that which I get because he is a much easier target than Boeheim or Hop or Red but the reality is that it is the staff as a whole and not on one person in my opinion. I think the frustration is that our 3rd assistant shouldn't be the primary recruiter. This goes back to USA Basketball and I'm sure we have discussed this enough.I think there's legit reason to be critical of Gerry, but that pendulum has swung waaaaaay too far over now.
OK.
Have you ever been a salesman?
I have --- for IBM way back.
We had about a 70% share of the mainframe business, but we didn't get every order. Sometimes, no matter how strong an effort we made, no matter how much information we provided, no matter how much our solution was technically better or better supported, we just didn't get the order. We chased every order we thought we had a legitimate shot at as hard as we could with as much skill and resources as we could muster. (We didn't have a limit like the number of scholarships.)
Other coaches have products (programs) they are selling too. It's not always the salesperson's fault.
It's not dropping the ball. It's not failure. It's how the real world works.
What I would very much like to know is who else they looked at/interviewed? Im in the camp that they should have gone out and grabbed a well connected recruiter or and AAU head coach type because I think the program could have used a nice boost on the recruiting front and this was a perfect opportunity to take advantage of the situation. That said, I don't hate the hire. I think AG could very well be a hard working, solid XO's coach who is dedicated to the University. My biggest concern is with my original question, who else did they consider?
If the staff and administration conducted their due process and deemed AG their guy then I will feel better. But, if there were no real interviews, litte conversation and dialog on the direction and needs of the program, well then, I couldn't agree more with it being a lazy hire (If that did occur it would also bring up some questions regarding the new AD). So I am very interested to find out how extensive the process was.
The big kid we brought in this year was a gmac recruit.So its an agenda when people who love GMac as a player say the guy fell into a elite job and hasn't done a good job in that job. Either as a guard coach or as a recruiter. After the Fine incident JB should have brought in a coach. He gave GMac that job. People can hold him to a higher standard as a result.
I can list recruits Hopkins and Autry have brought in. GMac wasn't the primary recruiter for anybody except Moyer and Francis even said that was really a Hopkins start job and GMac finished.
It is not an agenda. You think GMac is good as a recruiter? Let's hear why.
I would say it's a 'safe' hire without knowing what you lay out above -- which is how much effort was put into the search. The other point that I'll make, and I'm not sure if it's been made in this thread previously, is does the program desperately need a dynamic recruiter or are they fine with a solid one? My point being, do they maybe tweak the recruiting strategy to find players further down in the rankings that are more likely to stay for multiple years? Do they recruit similar kids but really push the 'family' angle of syracuse basketball?
Not sure how valid either of those points are but they seem worth considering.
Brissett or Sidibe?The big kid we brought in this year was a gmac recruit.
Brissett or Sidibe?
Brissett seems like the higher upside player down the road IMO.
Brissett or Sidibe?
Brissett seems like the higher upside player down the road IMO.
Sidibe was primarily G-Mac.Brissett or Sidibe?
Brissett seems like the higher upside player down the road IMO.
That's not inconsistent with what I said. Any time he would get pulled and yelled at probably wore him down, even though it wasn't anything JB wouldn't do to all his players when they are messing up.I think with Kaleb it was about being thrust into a role that he or the team wasn't expecting him to have. He lost confidence and never recovered. I thought he would be a good player. I think Ron Patterson and Chino were both mistakes but mistakes happen. I agree recruiting is about projecting and that is an inexact science. I have to do that for my work and can sympathize. I personally liked Brunson, Newton and Morris a lot and I feel like many other posters did as well so that is why I brought them up. If we had made the mistake with Morris and gotten another good PG it wouldn't have been as much of an issue.