007
All American
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 6,139
- Like
- 16,534
What illusion? 18-1 indicated that we were pretty damn good. Even at 18-1 we knew that we'd go about as far as our guard play would take us. Seems to me that's exactly what happened:
1) A Final Four...Yes, we were pretty damn good this year.
2) Guard Play...It was MCW and Brandon's play that got us past IU and Marquette. And it was their drop off against UM that resulted in the loss.
Sorry for pontificating, but I really think the early season schedule and results showed us exactly who we were and what we needed to continue to be successful. It was pretty obvious if you were looking close enough.
By that line of logic, it would be difficult to explain how that 18-1 team managed to lose 7 of the last 12 to end the regular season. Maybe I wasn't "looking close enough," but what I thought I saw is that the end of the schedule - you know, the part were we played the best teams in the league - exposed our true offensive deficiencies, more than the early part of the schedule showed us how important the guard play was.
The job that JB did compensating for those deficienies, once they were exposed, is some of the best coaching he has done in his career, IMO. And to me, that is the reason why we made the run through the BET and NCAA. It had very little to do with what transpired while the team was going 18-1 against Wagner, Princeton, Colgate, Monmouth, Alcorn St, Central Conn, E. Mich and so on.