GoSU96
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 21,608
- Like
- 42,162
We are definitely doing better than the last guy we fired, but not quite as good as the other guy we fired.
We are definitely doing better than the last guy we fired, but not quite as good as the other guy we fired.
Put Reyes (Sr) and Rhodes (Jr) on this years team and what do you think would have happened?
we ran the ball better that year but we also ran it more often - i know it can be related but we're much more pass heavy nowReyes and Rhodes rushed for almost 1700 yards combined that year...Not putting Ant down, but definitely better talent in the backfield than now...
Passing game was a mess both years
I would be hard pressed to say Marone has more to work with at the skills
Reyes and Rhodes rushed for almost 1700 yards combined that year...Not putting Ant down, but definitely better talent in the backfield than now...
Passing game was a mess both years
I would be hard pressed to say Marone has more to work with at the skills
Put Reyes (Sr) and Rhodes (Jr) on this years team and what do you think would have happened?
Improvement or not?
Two ways of measuring, against where you started from and against the field.
First page is yards,
Second is national ranking (1-120) for six offensive categories.
Reyes was hurt all year in 2004. Marrone had two years of DC3 and Bailey. That IMO is a better combo than a banged up Reyes and Rhodes. The WRs Marrone has had are a lot better. As is the QB.
Reyes was hurt all year in 2004. Marrone had two years of DC3 and Bailey. That IMO is a better combo than a banged up Reyes and Rhodes. The WRs Marrone has had are a lot better. As is the QB.
Hurt all year? he started nine games. Better combo?, not from an ability to score from anywhere on the field it isn't. Both those guys had it. They scored 17 rushing TD's between the two of them.
And when they had Carter and Bailey together last year the average was 140 a game, which isn't bad. And the comment was in reference to this years team. But neither was a threat to score every time they touched the ball, which is a major part of the problem.
Take the QBs, RBs, and WRs that Marrone has had and put them on the 2004 SU team and that O is a lot better. Take Perry Patterson, Reyes/Rhodes, and the 04 WRs on this years team and we still stink on O.
Jesus, it's not even the point of the post.
Here's the point, the offense is recovering from where it had been, the trend is up in every measure but running the ball. What is is lacking are one or two guys that can stretch the field and threaten to score from anywhere. That's the next step.
That 2004 O was a bad O that lacked skill talent yet it is better than any O Marrone has had, even though he had more to work with at the skills. So that tells me it is either 1. OL play (which is supposed to be Marrone's specialty), 2. System, or 3. some combo of 1 and 2.
Coach DeLeone knows how to run the football.
He also probably had better OL talent - Franklin, Greene, Tarullo, Ojinaka - and better talent at RB - Reyes, Rhodes, Hanoian, and Ferri.
Perry P was probably less effective than Ryan Nassib, and I suspect that DeLeone did not have as much talent at WR.
But he won six games, beat Pitt, Rutgers, UConn, BC and came very close against Florida State.
So, who knows?
But the point was in 2004 we were a lot better on O vs 2009-11. In 2004 we didn't have a QB or WRs to stretch the field. And I would bet that Bailey has more 20+ runs this year than we had in 2004. It isn't the skill positions that are holding us back. It is an OL than isn't even close to as good as the 04 OL and a system that isn't as good as the one in 04. The OL can't be fixed over night. It will take another 2-3 years. However the system can be fixed sooner.
Rice Moss was freshman that year, Steve Gregory was a junior and Jared Jones was a senior
vs Van Chew, Alex Lemon and Dorian Graham this year