NYT on Carolina cheating | Page 2 | Syracusefan.com

NYT on Carolina cheating

That's a good point. UNC should get the death penalty if they are judged on the same scale SU was. When they get a loss of 1 scholarship and the women's BB team gets a 1 year ban, we should immediately press to have wins restored.

And extra scholarships for 4 years!
 
SU was vilified in the media (all media) during the NCAA tourney. Compare to UNC? Crickets. Expect any sanctions they get to be a joke. I expect any weak sanctions they get to fall mostly on football and women's basketball, not men's basketball. The NCAA system is rigged. Certain schools have powerful connections that shield them.
 
Unc has the best lawyers in the country working on this. There's literally no point in me trying to debunk most of the garbage in that article because people are going to believe what they want to believe. But don't be surprised when this is all said and done if the NCAA aren't the ones looking like the real "criminals".


Out of curiosity what is your opinion of the issue that Syracuse had with the NCAA a few years ago with the paper for Fab?
 
Like I said, you all will believe what you want and your mind is already made up so trying to engage in any kind of meaningful discourse is a waste of energy and will prob be fruitless. Needless to say the national media has been clueless to the actual facts of this case for a long long time and this nyt article is just hype generated on final four weekend, and does nothing but continue to parrot blatant lies that is only worthy of some second rate rag paper. Quite unfortunate.

But as I said unc has some heavy hitters on their side who by the time this is over will expose the NCAA hypocrisy for what it is and a field day will be had. Until then, you all can keep believing what you'd like.
 
Out of curiosity what is your opinion of the issue that Syracuse had with the NCAA a few years ago with the paper for Fab?

I think it was another case of the NCAA taking way too long to rule on anything and the time they held you all hostage was probably punishment enough for whatever the ridiculous infraction your player or program committed. So in essence, I think it was probably a joke. Taking away boeheims wins is ridiculous.
 
Athletes and non athletes took no show / free grade classes partially taxpayer funded for over a quarter of a century. No one is disputing that. Just a matter of what the NCAA control of it is.

...and on top of that, those no show / free grade classes were used to artificially inflate the GPAs of athletes, which may have kept some eligible who otherwise should not have been. Ultimately, that is going to be where the NCAA is going to have to come down on them, IMO.

That these dummy courses were available to everyone doesn't excuse two decades of academic impropriety.
 
Like I said, you all will believe what you want and your mind is already made up so trying to engage in any kind of meaningful discourse is a waste of energy and will prob be fruitless. Needless to say the national media has been clueless to the actual facts of this case for a long long time and this nyt article is just hype generated on final four weekend, and does nothing but continue to parrot blatant lies that is only worthy of some second rate rag paper. Quite unfortunate.

But as I said unc has some heavy hitters on their side who by the time this is over will expose the NCAA hypocrisy for what it is and a field day will be had. Until then, you all can keep believing what you'd like.

You won't have a hard time selling anybody here on the notion that the Notoriously Corrupt Athletic Association is a shady outfit. But can you articulate in a few sentences why the UNC charges are overblown?
 
In the time you've taken to post all these times and NOT actually say anything concrete in defense of the program, you keep dancing around in circles and not actually saying anything of substance.

I have no doubt UNC has hired the best lawyers $ can buy, because they stand to lose BIGLY if this goes against them.
 
Like I said, you all will believe what you want and your mind is already made up so trying to engage in any kind of meaningful discourse is a waste of energy and will prob be fruitless. Needless to say the national media has been clueless to the actual facts of this case for a long long time and this nyt article is just hype generated on final four weekend, and does nothing but continue to parrot blatant lies that is only worthy of some second rate rag paper. Quite unfortunate.

But as I said unc has some heavy hitters on their side who by the time this is over will expose the NCAA hypocrisy for what it is and a field day will be had. Until then, you all can keep believing what you'd like.
Is the Raleigh News and Observer clueless?
 
You won't have a hard time selling anybody here on the notion that the Notoriously Corrupt Athletic Association is a shady outfit. But can you articulate in a few sentences why the UNC charges are overblown?

This is every UNC fan's argument. The NCAA is wrong and the media is misrepresenting the facts. Both those statements are believable but they never explain what actually happened.
 
Is the Raleigh News and Observer clueless?
I actually read the book and it is very persuasive that UNC went way, way over the line for a very, very long time.
 
Like I said, you all will believe what you want and your mind is already made up so trying to engage in any kind of meaningful discourse is a waste of energy and will prob be fruitless. Needless to say the national media has been clueless to the actual facts of this case for a long long time and this nyt article is just hype generated on final four weekend, and does nothing but continue to parrot blatant lies that is only worthy of some second rate rag paper. Quite unfortunate.

But as I said unc has some heavy hitters on their side who by the time this is over will expose the NCAA hypocrisy for what it is and a field day will be had. Until then, you all can keep believing what you'd like.

You say we have made up our minds. So have you. Both sides presumably on the perception of the information we have. Article was a hit piece. However, that specific article isn't the issue.

What's the crux of ur argument? What is the ah-ha moment UNC is going to pull on the NCAA?
 
In the time you've taken to post all these times and NOT actually say anything concrete in defense of the program, you keep dancing around in circles and not actually saying anything of substance.

I have no doubt UNC has hired the best lawyers $ can buy, because they stand to lose BIGLY if this goes against them.

As I said , me taking the time to post any rebuttals vis a Vis this or any other propaganda piece will just bring out more counter arguments that since none of you have all the information will be ridiculously tedious to try and persuade you, resulting in a waste of time.

The info is out there for whoever would like to really inform themselves and come to their own conclusion. But if you've been getting all your info on this case from pieces like this and the n and o, then we wouldn't even be in the same universe for any jumping off point for any type of meaningful discourse.
 
As I said , me taking the time to post any rebuttals vis a Vis this or any other propaganda piece will just bring out more counter arguments that since none of you have all the information will be ridiculously tedious to try and persuade you, resulting in a waste of time.

The info is out there for whoever would like to really inform themselves and come to their own conclusion. But if you've been getting all your info on this case from pieces like this and the n and o, then we wouldn't even be in the same universe for any jumping off point for any type of meaningful discourse.

Then what are you doing here
 
As I said , me taking the time to post any rebuttals vis a Vis this or any other propaganda piece will just bring out more counter arguments that since none of you have all the information will be ridiculously tedious to try and persuade you, resulting in a waste of time.

The info is out there for whoever would like to really inform themselves and come to their own conclusion. But if you've been getting all your info on this case from pieces like this and the n and o, then we wouldn't even be in the same universe for any jumping off point for any type of meaningful discourse.


You've spent paragraphs saying nothing. What's the elevator pitch to defend UNC?
 
As I said , me taking the time to post any rebuttals vis a Vis this or any other propaganda piece will just bring out more counter arguments that since none of you have all the information will be ridiculously tedious to try and persuade you, resulting in a waste of time.

The info is out there for whoever would like to really inform themselves and come to their own conclusion. But if you've been getting all your info on this case from pieces like this and the n and o, then we wouldn't even be in the same universe for any jumping off point for any type of meaningful discourse.
Ok, please provide us with some links to this supposedly exculpatory information. It wouldn't waste any more of your time than your other posts here.
 
As I said , me taking the time to post any rebuttals vis a Vis this or any other propaganda piece will just bring out more counter arguments that since none of you have all the information will be ridiculously tedious to try and persuade you, resulting in a waste of time.

The info is out there for whoever would like to really inform themselves and come to their own conclusion. But if you've been getting all your info on this case from pieces like this and the n and o, then we wouldn't even be in the same universe for any jumping off point for any type of meaningful discourse.

Fire us the cliff notes version.

I would argue we are already awash in tedium based on your cryptic responses.

"I will take the time to respond to your inquiries, however I will not respond to your inquiries as that would be a waste of time!"
 
Last edited:
heavy hitters.

images.jpg
 
The replies I've received tell me all I need to know about any open mindedness to new information and how it would be received. I get it, your rival fans so it benefits you to remain ignorant and throw around cliches and parrot the official line. Which is fine but just remember when the reality comes to light you did have a chance to educate yourselves. Anyway have a game to get ready for. Good luck in your future seasons.
 
As I said , me taking the time to post any rebuttals vis a Vis this or any other propaganda piece will just bring out more counter arguments that since none of you have all the information will be ridiculously tedious to try and persuade you, resulting in a waste of time.

The info is out there for whoever would like to really inform themselves and come to their own conclusion. But if you've been getting all your info on this case from pieces like this and the n and o, then we wouldn't even be in the same universe for any jumping off point for any type of meaningful discourse.

Based on the level of your grammar one could surmise you also received a fake degree at UNC.
 
Last edited:
The replies I've received tell me all I need to know about any open mindedness to new information and how it would be received. I get it, your rival fans so it benefits you to remain ignorant and throw around cliches and parrot the official line. Which is fine but just remember when the reality comes to light you did have a chance to educate yourselves. Anyway have a game to get ready for. Good luck in your future seasons.

The replies you've received are because your not saying anything but "Everyones wrong, look it up yourselves."

Thats kind of not how it works.
 
The replies I've received tell me all I need to know about any open mindedness to new information and how it would be received. I get it, your rival fans so it benefits you to remain ignorant and throw around cliches and parrot the official line. Which is fine but just remember when the reality comes to light you did have a chance to educate yourselves. Anyway have a game to get ready for. Good luck in your future seasons.

You are misreading us badly. We have less animosity towards UNC than just about any other team in general. Our primary beef is the kid gloves treatment UNC has gotten from the media and the preposterous soft shoe the NCAA has done to avoid going after UNC. You are here with a sob story about hit pieces and other anti UNC propaganda. I'm sorry but you have no clue what any of that is. It's like complaining about stubbing your toe to a guy who had both legs amputated. We got absolutely smoked by the NCAA for allegations that amount to 1/1000th of what UNC's own reports have uncovered and we know you will get no punishment.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
700
Replies
5
Views
477
    • Like
Orangeyes Daily Articles for Wednesday for Basketball
Replies
8
Views
550
Replies
7
Views
625
Replies
5
Views
532

Forum statistics

Threads
167,695
Messages
4,721,271
Members
5,915
Latest member
vegasnick

Online statistics

Members online
175
Guests online
1,940
Total visitors
2,115


Top Bottom