Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="pfister1, post: 401165, member: 285"]
I don't think most people (with an exception or two) were questioning the quality of the recruits, anyone who watches are recruiting and grades based solely on the services' star system hasn't been paying attention for very long.  What most were questioning is the make up of the roster that we seem to be creating as a result of the players that are committed and/or likely to have left.
 
   JB doesn't have a perfect track record in having the greatest roster makeup.  E.g. No capable PG on the '90 team; having to play Harris/Rautins at the SF in 08-09; no real inside offensive threat last season.   And, yes this is a pretty minor criticism when you look at the time span. 
 
   And roster makeup can be a greater or lesser problem depending on how the talent develops and the season unfolds.   Right now that 2013-14 team looks like it will have a log jam at the SG position with a lack of capable ball handlers to spell an unproven frosh at PG.  
 
     It is legitimate criticism; however events may unfold between now and then that prove all the worriers wrong e.g. MCW may return, Patterson or Cooney may prove to be/develop into a serviceable backup PG, Ennis may be capable of handling huge minutes at the point.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?