Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="wgdsr, post: 4258494, member: 7179"]
thanks, interesting interview. it was from a print interview probably in the balto sun. i tried googling 5 or 6 diff things and came up empty.

the gist of it was as u may have seen posted elsewhere... "we put the top 8 at large rpis on the board and then evaluated whether anything jumped out that was off."  presumably vs other candidates.  and once you do that (with a metric that isn't even a criterion), while u haven't sealed anything, now the hill to climb is much steeper.  and maybe you've chosen it already.  particularly because teams are on the bubble for a reason, and there's unlikely to be some huge difference bt one in and one out.  add in the fact that jhu lined up as 3 in as a 9 and it's over for a cornell.

his interview here -- evaluating 4 criteria ---contains one completely made up criterion (rpi), and 2 interpretations (top 10 and top 20 wins) which seem like their own versions.  maybe they have that flexibility and maybe it's just whatever the committee wants to do.  losses don't come in to his consideration per his words until they feel like it (high point).

try figuring that out!!!
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?