Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Horn88, post: 4940105, member: 7087"]
In my first post on this I said I was pro portal and pro NIL and I always have held that stance.

And I think the difference in our opinion on this is evident in you referring to it as “their” situation and I’m talking about the current dynamic for every school who loses their coach after the portal closes. Washington is going to get raided and Arizona will likely see a mass exodus and that’s not fair to them either. If you judge a rule/system based on your personal sentiment towards the party being impacted then you probably aren’t giving it reasonable thought.

Players should 100% be able to freely transfer and that is even more true if their coach leaves. The current dynamic of other schools having 30 days to freely poach a roster while a school either has no staff in place to retain or has a staff in transition while they know their players are stuck for another few months. Then that school having almost no pool of players to replenish your program with until after spring isn’t very well thought out. Just because the first case is Bama and people are happy to see them struggle shouldn’t prevent people from seeing that there should be a change to the process.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?