donniesyracuse
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 8,994
- Like
- 14,896
Tuesday at 3 AM is going to be tough.Sucks there are two good matchups early morning tomorrow. Two games I'm very curious to see how things go.
Tuesday at 3 AM is going to be tough.Sucks there are two good matchups early morning tomorrow. Two games I'm very curious to see how things go.
Indeed.Tuesday at 3 AM is going to be tough.
I have now watched a number of games and am stunned at the lack of technical quality of the US players compared to other teams.Glad I accidentally missed watching this one. US ladies clearly look about 8th or 9th best right now in this WC.
I have now watched a number of games and am stunned at the lack of technical quality of the US players compared to other teams.
Cannot play out of the back; cannot play out of pressure; cannot complete simple give and gos. We seem to think we need an act of congress to switch fields. We literally play kick and run. Portugal ran rings around the US technically. And, if you think Portugal is technical, wait until you watch Spain or Japan,
So, the question is, is the better training available in more established countries creating that gap (which we see in spades on the men's side) or is the US fixation with speed and athleticism causing more technical players who may be less athletic to be excluded from the mix? I do not know that answer to that question.
Sophia Smith has no soccer IQ. None. Zero. She receives the ball and she runs at the defense until she gets stripped. No idea how to release a pass. Her spacing was better today but she gets the ball and consistently runs into double and triple teams. And yet we keep playing down that left-hand side. Why? Rapinoe may not be able to give you 90 and she is clearly not what she once was but she looked better than Smith in the time she was in there.
We saw Williams start for Rodman but we barely played down the right-hand side because Fox has no interest in getting forward.
The midfield? Horan has done a boatload of running over the three games. She has to be wearing down. Lavelle is suspended for the round of 16. And Sullivan is basically the female version of Beckerman. Is there anyone other than DeMelo?
Reading articles, that Sauerbrunn injury is really hurting the team as Ertz really should be playing the 6 but is being forced into the centerback role.
Assuming we play Sweden, I will be stunned if we beat them unless there is some magic on the bench that we have not yet seen and Andonovski is willing to roll the dice. Doubtful. He makes Berhalter look like Leonard Hamilton when it comes to subbing.
Great post, as usual.I have now watched a number of games and am stunned at the lack of technical quality of the US players compared to other teams.
Cannot play out of the back; cannot play out of pressure; cannot complete simple give and gos. We seem to think we need an act of congress to switch fields. We literally play kick and run. Portugal ran rings around the US technically. And, if you think Portugal is technical, wait until you watch Spain or Japan,
So, the question is, is the better training available in more established countries creating that gap (which we see in spades on the men's side) or is the US fixation with speed and athleticism causing more technical players who may be less athletic to be excluded from the mix? I do not know that answer to that question.
Sophia Smith has no soccer IQ. None. Zero. She receives the ball and she runs at the defense until she gets stripped. No idea how to release a pass. Her spacing was better today but she gets the ball and consistently runs into double and triple teams. And yet we keep playing down that left-hand side. Why? Rapinoe may not be able to give you 90 and she is clearly not what she once was but she looked better than Smith in the time she was in there.
We saw Williams start for Rodman but we barely played down the right-hand side because Fox has no interest in getting forward.
The midfield? Horan has done a boatload of running over the three games. She has to be wearing down. Lavelle is suspended for the round of 16. And Sullivan is basically the female version of Beckerman. Is there anyone other than DeMelo?
Reading articles, that Sauerbrunn injury is really hurting the team as Ertz really should be playing the 6 but is being forced into the centerback role.
Assuming we play Sweden, I will be stunned if we beat them unless there is some magic on the bench that we have not yet seen and Andonovski is willing to roll the dice. Doubtful. He makes Berhalter look like Leonard Hamilton when it comes to subbing.
Forgot about Macario. And of course, Swanson. Maybe those two would be enough to change our fortunes .It's bad. There is clearly something wrong at the youth levels going on here. While the women's game is still developing world wide- the previous versions had a stable of players who were strong technically. Morgan has never been one of those players but Heath, Press, Rapinoe( aging out now and just not able to do the same things) , Lloyd, Sauerbrun out of the back and so on.
I will say the missing pieces via injury are glaring with having Rodman and Smith out there. They are end of the bench last cycle and now pushed into starting roles they aren't setup for.
Swanson, Macario and Press are the big 3 injuries and all showing up massively.
None of that is an excuse for the massive poor showing so far and the dearth of technical prowess. House cleaning is very much needed after this WC.
Great post, as usual.
We aren't bigger, stronger, faster than the rest of the world anymore. We need to be better technically, as you said. Watching Smith dribbling into three defenders was very frustrating, but she wasn't the only one..
Yes, we miss Sauerbrunn, but maybe miss Abby Dahlkemper even more. Either one would help get Hertz back to the 6, where she needs to be. Also missing Sam Mewis, Tobin Heath and others.
Listening to many opinions today and there is a lot of criticism for Vlatko's game plan both offensively and defensively, as well as his use of subs. What do you think of those that suggest he is lacking in some way?
BTW, I think you are dead in suggesting that it will be difficult to beat Sweden.
Hard for me to say.What do you think of those that suggest he is lacking in some way?
Read these two articles and thought some posters in this thread might find interesting. Second link is from July and is referenced in the first article as a summary of problems with player development.
Yahoo - USWNT's problems, explained
US Soccer Girls Youth Pipeline Issues
Yep. Good find. I've heard stuff anecdotally but don't follow it as closely as the men's. It's sad they got complacent and then just became inept at managing the youth system. I'm sure it's no coincidence the politics of equal pay played their role even of its not on the surface.
It seems across the board we have major fractures in the infrastructure that supports youth sports. From how the NCAA manages the highest levels to youth systems to the safety of female athletes and issues with predators... there is a lot of work to be done... while we also sit in the middle of a culture war.
I think the pay-to-play youth system, with our vast college soccer options, are the biggest drivers of why the USMNT hasn't gotten over the hump (yet) and why the USWNT are losing ground.
One of the articles had a quote comparing American women spending 4 years at DI schools vs European ladies now spending 4 years at elite youth academies (e.g. Barca, PSG, etc.). That, to me, is the most telling.
I know the Development Academies are improving the men's talent pipeline but I still think the youth system feeding those organizations is limited by pay-to-play structures.
ETA - As most on here already know, pay-to-play is not unique to soccer. Profit driven club organizations are less interested in player development, more interested in talent accumulation/results.
Yep, and given the seismic changes in and around college sports (NIL, conference realignment, gambling, etc.) it looks like the U.S. may be headed toward some quasi Rest of the World model.The unique component of how the U.S. values collegiate athletics, much of it due to the financial aspect, is the elephant in the room. European countries and really many countries across the globe treat college as mostly an academic and social part of society not athletics in favor of the more efficient club system.
Not really underdogs. Sweden is +255. Don’t forget there is draw betting.Team USA is +115 underdogs vs Sweden