Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 4648139, member: 1969"] Just to continue on my post above, I understand the theory behind the "super events". It has its pro's and con's (it really hurts non designated events which is unfortunate), but I think the pro's outweigh the cons and was the proper way for the PGA to combat LIV. The PGA needed to go that direction. But come on now the Canon Open designated super status over the Canadian Open? Perhaps some of my neighbors to the south may not agree with me. Or they could have not designated either, given that they already have 2 large events in the 4 week period, and put the super event elsewhere on the schedule. Once you create a 3rd in 4 weeks, you lay the death blow on the 4th event. [/QUOTE]