Niastri
Two Time Iggy Award Winner: Edwards for Three!
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 3,978
- Like
- 11,825
The NET is even dumber than I thought if it's taking season long average margin of victory instead of individual game margin of victory.My understanding is 10 is the limit/metric as I understand it but it rounds down so many hit that 10 mark with many teams moving up and down between 9 and 10 as it averages out.
So for instance if you have a MOV of 9.5 and then win a few games by 30, over a 31 game season you will see a move to being at 10 which if weighted improperly will jump you in the rankings. All the same if you win by 40 8 times then you can no longer have to worry about having a MOV value of 10 throughout the year or just below at worst.
So using efficiency metrics and MOV can duplicate the weighting of large wins. This getting rid of it or using a Sagarin like approach makes more sense to get a comprehensive ranking that helps avoid bias.
Smh.