Class of 2026 - 2025-26 Portal | Page 12 | Syracusefan.com

Class of 2026 2025-26 Portal

Donnie wants the big pay day but Sadiq has the higher value. Donnie, the way he plays, needs to add 25 lbs and a low post game. His footspeed is below average, he plays a little above the rim but not much and is not quick getting his shot off from outside. Add that to the injury history and his NIL ask is off the reservation unless 60 pct of that is incentive driven.
Cannot be incentive driven.
 
Donnie wants the big pay day but Sadiq has the higher value. Donnie, the way he plays, needs to add 25 lbs and a low post game. His footspeed is below average, he plays a little above the rim but not much and is not quick getting his shot off from outside. Add that to the injury history and his NIL ask is off the reservation unless 60 pct of that is incentive driven.
yes
 
Cannot be incentive driven.

Not directly- but the player needs to understand if they want to max out and add other deals that will come with success and other interested business leaders offering deals. The genesis of it is that you cannot pay Donnie anything north of 1.5 given the baggage and what we know out of the gate.

I should have been more specific. An example is a kid that plays at JMU whose father I work and when talking hoops and NIL part of the package was around earning potential and those opportunities opening up if things went well. This versus NIL commitments that never pan out because the money isn’t there.
 
Loyalties: loyalty to a school, loyalty to a coach, loyalty to a team or loyalty to money. What drives a player now days to return for another season?

The loyalty to a coach or to a team does not come into play when a coach is fired and when a team changes its face every portal period. Loyalty to a school is now questionable due to NIL.

That leaves loyalty to money. You pay me what I want and I will stay and play for you.

I believe that is what will be the determining factor for Donnie Freeman and Sadiq White. Pay them what they want and they will stay. There is no longer an interest in a coach’s vision or the academic benefits that a school can offer. Don’t mean to be jaded but it is now about show me the money.
 
Loyalties: loyalty to a school, loyalty to a coach, loyalty to a team or loyalty to money. What drives a player now days to return for another season?

The loyalty to a coach or to a team does not come into play when a coach is fired and when a team changes its face every portal period. Loyalty to a school is now questionable due to NIL.

That leaves loyalty to money. You pay me what I want and I will stay and play for you.

I believe that is what will be the determining factor for Donnie Freeman and Sadiq White. Pay them what they want and they will stay. There is no longer an interest in a coach’s vision or the academic benefits that a school can offer. Don’t mean to be jaded but it is now about show me the money.
100%. It’s pretty black and white, no shades of grey. I may like college x but college y offers me twice as much, what would you do????
 
Not directly- but the player needs to understand if they want to max out and add other deals that will come with success and other interested business leaders offering deals. The genesis of it is that you cannot pay Donnie anything north of 1.5 given the baggage and what we know out of the gate.

I should have been more specific. An example is a kid that plays at JMU whose father I work and when talking hoops and NIL part of the package was around earning potential and those opportunities opening up if things went well. This versus NIL commitments that never pan out because the money isn’t there.
If it ain't in the contract, on paper, it ain't real.
 
It was reported by a few insiders that White , who is from the south had some challenges acclimating to Syracuse winters. Not sure if that was an ongoing issue or not. It could in this specific situation be a factor.
 
Cannot be incentive driven.
Why? Edit: A company could easily include language around the program and create tiers in the contract tying number of games played to incremental benefits for the company and therefore incremental benefits to the player.
 
Why? Edit: A company could easily include language around the program and create tiers in the contract tying number of games played to incremental benefits for the company and therefore incremental benefits to the player.
This is 100% illegal for college sports. The agreement is guaranteed to be rejected by the clearinghouse.
 
This is 100% illegal for college sports. The agreement is guaranteed to be rejected by the clearinghouse.
I bet we could get it to pass, you just slip them a fiver, all smooth like.
 
If it ain't in the contract, on paper, it ain't real.

Sure - but if you are Donnie and want it in the contract- it ain’t happening. Hence the slimy workarounds that, real or not, are very much part of this game. Only sharing what I’ve been told…
 

Forum statistics

Threads
175,115
Messages
5,327,996
Members
6,227
Latest member
cuse_1997

Online statistics

Members online
268
Guests online
8,297
Total visitors
8,565


Top Bottom