OrangeXtreme
The Mayor of Dewitt
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 245,673
- Like
- 455,723

Women’s lacrosse rules proposals look to simplify penalty structure, improve pace of play - NCAA.org
The NCAA Women's Lacrosse Rules Committee recommended rules changes to simplify the penalty structure and improve the pace of play, beginning with the 2025-26 academic

The NCAA Women's Lacrosse Rules Committee recommended rules changes to simplify the penalty structure and improve the pace of play, beginning with the 2025-26 academic year.
The proposals must be approved by the NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel before becoming official. The panel is scheduled to discuss the women's lacrosse recommendations Aug. 13.
Committee members, who met last week in Indianapolis, approved the following measures:
- Expanding one-minute releasable penalties in the midfield to all over the field, except in the critical scoring area.
- Using an advantage signal for one-minute releasable penalties, when applicable, which would allow teams the opportunity to play on. The one-minute penalty could be negated if a goal is scored during the advantage or administered at the conclusion of the advantage period.
- Running the clock on 8-meter free positions, except for the last minute of each quarter or overtime.
- Setting up 8-meter free positions only at the two adjacent hashes on both sides of the center hash.
- Upgrading dangerous contact penalties to a nonreleasable yellow card.
- Flagging shooting space fouls in the critical scoring area.
The committee proposed ending stick checks after goals are scored. Currently, officials check the pocket depth of the stick of each goal scorer to see whether the stick is legal.
Also, teams would have 30 seconds after a goal is scored to be ready for the ensuing draw at midfield. If a team isn't ready for the draw by the end of the 30 seconds, possession would be awarded to the other team.
Overall, draws would occur only at the start of the game, at the start of overtime and after goals are scored. The team having possession of the ball at the end of the first, second and third quarters would maintain possession when the next quarter starts.
Committee members proposed a change to the way video challenges would be handled next season. If a team has a successful video review challenge in which the original call on the field is overturned, it would maintain its challenge. However, if the call on the field is not overturned, the team making the challenge would lose a timeout. Teams would have to have a timeout to make video review challenges.
At the request of teams, committee members also proposed expanding the categories of plays eligible for video review. Teams would be permitted to request video reviews for several areas that, in the past, were reviewable only at the officials' discretion. Under the new approach, officials no longer would have discretion over whether to initiate reviews, ensuring greater consistency in officiating nationwide. Officials would be required to review:
- Clock errors.
- Whether a shot is released before the possession clock or game clock expired.
- Fouls that cause ejection.