Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Antiprodigy, post: 2601873, member: 582"]
That is your view of the other side of the discussion.

Conversely, my view of your side of the discussion is that when there is a miss, the situation is dire.  If you recruited them, you needed them, so losing them is a sign that the bottom has fallen out.  And since you ignore the discussion of the hits (signed players) Your posts seem to indicate that you discount the hits as a counterweight to the bottom falling out.

See how things look remarkably similar when you actually look at both sides of the discussion.  I guess it just depends on whether you choose to be a "glass half full" or "glass half empty" sort of person.

The reality is that with the combination of sanctions allowing fewer coaches out recruiting (ie. developing relationships with recruits), along with the loss of the top recruiting assistant, the program was bound to be working from behind the curve with respect to a number of years worth of recruiting.  But, if you are a "glass half empty" person, you don't worry about or consider these events as mitigating factors.  The natural proclivity is to ignore them as factors. (In fact, I would hazard a guess that some people who post in this forum never even thought of these or understood the ramifications of these events)
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?