5:15: Wichita St vs Kansas | Page 2 | Syracusefan.com

5:15: Wichita St vs Kansas

Kansas got a bad draw here. Wichita was a three or four seed. Self is going to have to schedule with them now going forward.
 
Wichita State fans are really trolling Kansas with that mock Wh-eat-Sh--ock-ers chant like Kansas does with Rock Chalk Jayhawk in the chanting tone.
 
Shockers are good, but Big 12 was just very overrated this year...
Built their numbers playing each other during conference play.
The one thing the Tourney does is reveal overall strength of conference competition.
Big 12 and AAC were exposed...
 
  • Like
Reactions: cto
They're boom or bust. They've had some spectacular flameouts recently.

You're right. They've won four tourney games since 2012. That's horrible. They're a blue blood program.
 
CBS Sports CBB ‏@CBSSportsCBB
This photo seems to sum things up pretty well...

CAvSzkYWwAIiugw.jpg
 
UVA got a tough draw with Michigan State, but Wichita State was ranked 14th in the last poll and Kansas was ranked 10th. Kansas absolutely got screwed with Wichita State as a 7 seed.
I swear, every time I paid any attention to Kansas this year - they were losing. Streak continued today.
 
Shockers are good, but Big 12 was just very overrated this year...
Built their numbers playing each other during conference play.
The one thing the Tourney does is reveal overall strength of conference competition.
Big 12 and AAC were exposed...
And the Big East...
 
UVA got a tough draw with Michigan State, but Wichita State was ranked 14th in the last poll and Kansas was ranked 10th. Kansas absolutely got screwed with Wichita State as a 7 seed.

I think the committee tried too hard to make this matchup. I think the time has to come for non power 5/6 conferences to be seeded based purely on power rankings (or whatever conferences are below the conf RPI threshold). It's not a perfect solution, nor 100% fair, but the current system comparing teams with limited data is probably worse.
 
Shockers are good, but Big 12 was just very overrated this year...
Built their numbers playing each other during conference play.
The one thing the Tourney does is reveal overall strength of conference competition.
Big 12 and AAC were exposed...

I think the Big 12 was a legit 7 team conference. But they were over seeded because of all the top 50 matchups that was caused because of this. Anytime a conference has a high % of somewhat good, legit toureny teams, the metrics will make them all look better -- and a few them will turn from middle seeded teams to high seeded teams. In this case 4 top 3 seeded teams.

The same thing happened when the Big East was an 11 team league. The Big East was not as good as the seeds they were getting -- most of them top 6... but it still was a legit 9-11 team conference.
 
I think the Big 12 was a legit 7 team conference. But they were over seeded because of all the top 50 matchups that was caused because of this. Anytime a conference has a high % of somewhat good, legit toureny teams, the metrics will make them all look better -- and a few them will turn from middle seeded teams to high seeded teams. In this case 4 top 3 seeded teams.

The same thing happened when the Big East was an 11 team league. The Big East was not as good as the seeds they were getting -- most of them top 6... but it still was a legit 9-11 team conference.
Agree. My "uncalibrated Pe-Tourney eyeball" told me that no Big 12 club was worthy of anything higher than a 4 seed.
And the results are playing out that way...
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
697

Forum statistics

Threads
170,341
Messages
4,885,722
Members
5,992
Latest member
meierscreek

Online statistics

Members online
197
Guests online
1,004
Total visitors
1,201


...
Top Bottom