Cusefan0307
Red recruits the ACC!
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2011
- Messages
- 46,410
- Like
- 132,958
3-5 in games this year decided by less than 5 points. That’s the season folks.
Not so fast3-5 in games this year decided by less than 5 points. That’s the season folks.
Strange year as that’s often boeheim’s strong suit based on that slide rule stuff3-5 in games this year decided by less than 5 points. That’s the season folks.
I'm with you, blue. Too many seasons I said aw, shucks, that's it - it's over. Too many times (especially recent times), I was wrong! Not saying it's looking good, but it is not over for me until we have 0% chance of winning the tournament. To me, any team that can win their conference tourney or just go on an insane run still has a shot. We don't yet have a 0% shot. As a fan, I try to root and believe until the season is officially over. But I certainly get why people say it's over over.we can still do this.
the season is losing (getting blown out) to Iowa, Penn St, Oklahoma ST, & Georgetown out of conference. The ACC literally has 1 - 2 quality out of conference wins. I think during today's game they Lunardi had us at 83 in his bracket for what that is worth. We are not even sniffing the bracket.3-5 in games this year decided by less than 5 points. That’s the season folks.
*also I hate the ISO at the end of games...if passing the ball etc works to get the lead...Keep doing it!
the super-safe slow down conservative approach at the end of games does not enhance winning %...
since there is such a strong pattern of SU with big leads in games they have allowed to get whittled away and then lose, I think it is because of the strategy...
just because JB and SU usually get away with it doesnt mean it is the best strategy..
We don't yet have a 0% shot. As a fan, I try to root and believe until the season is officially over. But I certainly get why people say it's over over.
The data historically has been pretty positive for the strategy. I’d have to imagine this year these games are playing out a bit differently than what the expected %s have been in the past (in terms of winning).I'm just curious. Do you even realize that your second quote completely contradicts your first quote?
You should also read the other threads devoted to this topic. This is a large sample size of data that shows that JB is one of the best ever at winning close games.
You've got no shot at being right on this. The data tells a completely different story.
The data historically has been pretty positive for the strategy. I’d have to imagine this year these games are playing out a bit differently than what the expected %s have been in the past (in terms of winning).
The data historically has been pretty positive for the strategy. I’d have to imagine this year these games are playing out a bit differently than what the expected %s have been in the past (in terms of winning).