Moontan
2017 ESPN College Bowl Pick’em Winner
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2011
- Messages
- 10,099
- Like
- 9,885
That's Syracuse's rank in USA Today's "NCAA re-rank 1-124: Our list from first to last".
Here's how Paul Myerberg ranks the Orangemen compared to the rest of the NBE:
21. Louisville (5-0, 0-0)
22. Rutgers (5-0, 2-0)
24. Cincinnati (4-0, 1-0)
68. Temple (2-2, 1-0)
79. Syracuse (2-3, 1-0)
81. Pittsburgh (2-3, 0-2) – DOWN 20
84. Connecticut (3-3, 0-1)
92. South Florida (2-4, 0-2) – DOWN 21
Compared to the rest of the private schools:
7. Notre Dame (5-0, 0-0)
16. Southern California (4-1, 2-1)
20. Stanford (4-1, 1-1)
26. Baylor (3-1, 0-1)
31. Tulsa (5-1, 3-0)
34. TCU (4-1, 1-1) – DOWN 13
35. Northwestern (5-1, 1-1) – DOWN 10
36. Duke (5-1, 2-0) – UP 20
38. Brigham Young (4-2, 0-0) – UP 10
56. Miami (Fla.) (4-2, 3-0) – DOWN 19
59. Vanderbilt (2-3, 1-1) – UP 27
72. Wake Forest (3-3, 1-3)
79. Syracuse (2-3, 1-0)
91. Southern Methodist (2-3, 1-0)
108. Boston College (1-4, 0-2) – DOWN 7
118. Rice (1-5, 0-3)
124. Tulane (0-5, 0-1)
Compared to the ACC:
13. Florida State (5-1, 2-1) – DOWN 10
15. Clemson (5-1, 2-1)
33. North Carolina State (4-2, 1-1) – UP 25
36. Duke (5-1, 2-0) – UP 20
47. North Carolina (4-2, 1-1)
55. Virginia Tech (3-3, 1-1) – DOWN 12
56. Miami (Fla.) (4-2, 3-0) – DOWN 19
67. Maryland (3-2, 1-0)
72. Wake Forest (3-3, 1-3)
79. Syracuse (2-3, 1-0)
81. Pittsburgh (2-3, 0-2) – DOWN 20
82. Georgia Tech (2-4, 1-3)
87. Virginia (2-4, 0-2) – DOWN 19
Here's how Paul Myerberg ranks the Orangemen compared to the rest of the NBE:
21. Louisville (5-0, 0-0)
22. Rutgers (5-0, 2-0)
24. Cincinnati (4-0, 1-0)
68. Temple (2-2, 1-0)
79. Syracuse (2-3, 1-0)
81. Pittsburgh (2-3, 0-2) – DOWN 20
84. Connecticut (3-3, 0-1)
92. South Florida (2-4, 0-2) – DOWN 21
Compared to the rest of the private schools:
7. Notre Dame (5-0, 0-0)
16. Southern California (4-1, 2-1)
20. Stanford (4-1, 1-1)
26. Baylor (3-1, 0-1)
31. Tulsa (5-1, 3-0)
34. TCU (4-1, 1-1) – DOWN 13
35. Northwestern (5-1, 1-1) – DOWN 10
36. Duke (5-1, 2-0) – UP 20
38. Brigham Young (4-2, 0-0) – UP 10
56. Miami (Fla.) (4-2, 3-0) – DOWN 19
59. Vanderbilt (2-3, 1-1) – UP 27
72. Wake Forest (3-3, 1-3)
79. Syracuse (2-3, 1-0)
91. Southern Methodist (2-3, 1-0)
108. Boston College (1-4, 0-2) – DOWN 7
118. Rice (1-5, 0-3)
124. Tulane (0-5, 0-1)
Compared to the ACC:
13. Florida State (5-1, 2-1) – DOWN 10
15. Clemson (5-1, 2-1)
33. North Carolina State (4-2, 1-1) – UP 25
36. Duke (5-1, 2-0) – UP 20
47. North Carolina (4-2, 1-1)
55. Virginia Tech (3-3, 1-1) – DOWN 12
56. Miami (Fla.) (4-2, 3-0) – DOWN 19
67. Maryland (3-2, 1-0)
72. Wake Forest (3-3, 1-3)
79. Syracuse (2-3, 1-0)
81. Pittsburgh (2-3, 0-2) – DOWN 20
82. Georgia Tech (2-4, 1-3)
87. Virginia (2-4, 0-2) – DOWN 19
108. Boston College (1-4, 0-2) – DOWN 7