RF2044
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 30,906
- Like
- 100,207
Pretty impressive record. I think in the dismal aftermath of the 4-5 Mike Hopkins run, it was easy to lose sight of the fact that we were playing pretty good ball prior to the accelerated Boeheim suspension. We were coming off a couple of impressive wins over ranked teams in the Atlantis tournament, and stubbed our toe at home against Wisconsin in a game we should have won in regulation but blew at the FT line. That was disappointing, but we were 6-1.
Then the NCAA allowed us to move up the suspension, and Hopkins took over under not ideal circumstances. First game is on the road against our arch rival. We blow numerous close games that we probably win most of the time. And suddenly we look like a team fast tracking toward the NIT.
But when JB came back, we had top 10 UNC on the ropes, and just ran out of gas. Then we blow out BC and Wake, and win against Duke on the road. Depleted Duke, sure, but never easy to win at Cameron.
I have to believe that the committee will factor / take into account JB's absence as the reason for some of our losses. And I believe we can do enough to squeeze into the tourney, and be a tough out that some team will be sick to have to play in the first round as an underseeded team.
I'm not suggesting by any means that we're a lock, but we damn sure look like the team that played in Atlantis and looked like we could tough out wins and beat teams than we did in the 9 games when JB was absent.
Am I incorrect in suggesting that some may have written the team off too early? The team with JB on the bench versus him serving the suspension plays at a totally different level of execution.
Then the NCAA allowed us to move up the suspension, and Hopkins took over under not ideal circumstances. First game is on the road against our arch rival. We blow numerous close games that we probably win most of the time. And suddenly we look like a team fast tracking toward the NIT.
But when JB came back, we had top 10 UNC on the ropes, and just ran out of gas. Then we blow out BC and Wake, and win against Duke on the road. Depleted Duke, sure, but never easy to win at Cameron.
I have to believe that the committee will factor / take into account JB's absence as the reason for some of our losses. And I believe we can do enough to squeeze into the tourney, and be a tough out that some team will be sick to have to play in the first round as an underseeded team.
I'm not suggesting by any means that we're a lock, but we damn sure look like the team that played in Atlantis and looked like we could tough out wins and beat teams than we did in the 9 games when JB was absent.
Am I incorrect in suggesting that some may have written the team off too early? The team with JB on the bench versus him serving the suspension plays at a totally different level of execution.