A critical sequence in my eyes. | Syracusefan.com

A critical sequence in my eyes.

JoeSU

All American
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
4,398
Like
5,415
With around 5:30 left in the 2nd Qtr., we were up 21-10 and after Simmons INT, we had a chance to really put WF in a hole. Up until this point we had been moving the ball well on the ground, so I was envisioning a long, clock-consuming drive to end the half, and getting the ball again to start the 2nd half. Instead, we go 3-and-out (with 2 incomplete passes), and after a 33 yd punt, WF drives for a TD to cut our lead to 21-17.
 
With around 5:30 left in the 2nd Qtr., we were up 21-10 and after Simmons INT, we had a chance to really put WF in a hole. Up until this point we had been moving the ball well on the ground, so I was envisioning a long, clock-consuming drive to end the half, and getting the ball again to start the 2nd half. Instead, we go 3-and-out (with 2 incomplete passes), and after a 33 yd punt, WF drives for a TD to cut our lead to 21-17.

Thanks for the reminder!
 
It was also unfortunate the wideout made that tackle. Otherwise we get the return to like the 30 or so I would guess. I said in the game thread, if we punt here wake will have better field position than before the pick!
 
AGREE! I was thinking that Schwartzwalder, Mac, Marone and P would have kept it on the ground….like you say…and run out the clock with a score. Chit play calling, IMHO.
 
Last edited:
It was also unfortunate the wideout made that tackle. Otherwise we get the return to like the 30 or so I would guess. I said in the game thread, if we punt here wake will have better field position than before the pick!
I specifically recall you saying that in the GDT...and you were correct.
 
With around 5:30 left in the 2nd Qtr., we were up 21-10 and after Simmons INT, we had a chance to really put WF in a hole. Up until this point we had been moving the ball well on the ground, so I was envisioning a long, clock-consuming drive to end the half, and getting the ball again to start the 2nd half. Instead, we go 3-and-out (with 2 incomplete passes), and after a 33 yd punt, WF drives for a TD to cut our lead to 21-17.

Well that 5:30 also included the decision to accept the penalty giving them a chance to score a TD, which they did. As I’ve said a bunch, even if their kicker hits a career high, they would have still been down by 2 scores. Instead of the 4 points going in to the half, huge momentum difference. Also, if we force them to try the FG there, even if they miss we get a chance the ball back with a chance to negate the FG at least. If they miss the FG we have great field position.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
175,041
Messages
5,322,516
Members
6,223
Latest member
camdencentr

Online statistics

Members online
303
Guests online
3,101
Total visitors
3,404


Top Bottom