A little extra pressure for jaime Dixon
- Thread starter dasher
- Start date
Cusefan0307
Red recruits the ACC!
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2011
- Messages
- 46,966
- Like
- 135,528
Pitt has lost 9 out of their last 10 games in March.
They are 8-14 since 2012 in all non CBI March games.
Dixon is 286-89 (76.3%) in all games outside of March.
He is 41-32 in March (56.2%) All Time.
They are 8-14 since 2012 in all non CBI March games.
Dixon is 286-89 (76.3%) in all games outside of March.
He is 41-32 in March (56.2%) All Time.
pfister1
2023-24 Iggy Winner ACC & OOC Record
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 8,983
- Like
- 15,117
When we start trying to convince ourselves that we can win the game because of the past history between the two teams, because JB matches up well or whatever, it usually doesn't bode well for the actual matchup at hand.
orangenirvana
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2011
- Messages
- 8,133
- Like
- 12,448
dollarbill44
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 9,210
- Like
- 16,313
Yup. Past history really has no bearing on Wednesday. All we really have to lean on is hope that the team can play like we did in Atlantis.
Cusefan0307
Red recruits the ACC!
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2011
- Messages
- 46,966
- Like
- 135,528
We really could help ourselves with a win Wednesday. Not only will it guarantee us a tourney birth, but it could be Dixon's last meaningful game at Pittsburgh, and I don't think we will see someone new come in that is going to dominate us like he has. It's been reported down there that UNLV has real interest in him, and he's legit on the hot seat due to his annual late season failures. He might leave this year to avoid a possible ultimatum season there next year.
Cusefan0307
Red recruits the ACC!
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2011
- Messages
- 46,966
- Like
- 135,528
We've been in one post season since then.
pearl31
in cahoots
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2011
- Messages
- 15,078
- Like
- 36,203
Or even how we played against Pitt a couple weeks ago - but actually keep playing for the last 5 minutes
Moontan
2017 ESPN College Bowl Pick’em Winner
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2011
- Messages
- 10,273
- Like
- 10,201
1-1
Dixon is in a bit trouble there (and it has nothing to do with his postseason record against SU).
New AD. Program has leveled off considerably since peak, and worst of all, apathy has begun to show itself amongst their fan base.
His dismissal would not be deserved, but it could happen. I would not shed a tear.
br801
Co 2020-21 Iggy Award Winner Hoops Leading Scorer
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
- Messages
- 43,733
- Like
- 142,475
But damn, that CBI title sure was sweet.
MSOrange
2020 Cali Award Winner, Regular Season Record
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 50,706
- Like
- 124,380
Interesting to hear you say that because I saw a Pitt game earlier this year and the crowd looked very sparse. I don't remember who they were playing but never seen that many empty seats in the Pete before.
MikeSU02
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 13,222
- Like
- 49,425
We're dealing with our second probation, potential back to back years of no NCAAT, a new AD as well and Dixon, who has handled JB in the overall scheme of things, is the one that has extra pressure?
I think the pressure rests squarely on JB.
The guy is 325–118 at Pitt. He may be facing extra pressure, but we have plenty of it in our own house.
We Are Syracuse
All Conference
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2012
- Messages
- 2,609
- Like
- 3,036
We went to the FF 3 years ago?
HoustonCuse
2020-21 Iggy Winner Lead Scorer & Post Season Rcd
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 11,365
- Like
- 25,519
We'd get blown out. In just about every statistical area we were awful in that game.
two3zone
RIP Shark58
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2013
- Messages
- 70,056
- Like
- 77,995
Well, 1-2.
Moontan
2017 ESPN College Bowl Pick’em Winner
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2011
- Messages
- 10,273
- Like
- 10,201
Gotcha, I limited my sample to the NCAA tournament.
I'd open it up a bit and add 2013 as well.
That would yield: 3-1 + 5-1 + 0-1 + 1-1 = 9-4
All using the 2-3 zone.
People can spin things a lot of ways... it all depends on how negative they want to be.
two3zone
RIP Shark58
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2013
- Messages
- 70,056
- Like
- 77,995
Gotcha, I limited my sample to the NCAA tournament.
I'd open it up a bit and add 2013 as well.
That would yield: 3-1 + 5-1 + 0-1 + 1-1 = 9-4
All using the 2-3 zone.
People can spin things a lot of ways... it all depends on how negative they want to be.
The 2-3 zone is a great defense, probably the best defense there is. The problem is it can be a very very bad defense if you don't have the right personnel for it.
Similar threads
