Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Lacrosse Board
ACC 'Expansion' Thoughts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Hoo's That, post: 1758717, member: 3609"] Title IX is designed to protect [U]any[/U] student facing [U]any[/U] sort of discrimination by an academic institution receiving Federal money either directly (like research money) or through its students (like Pell Grants); it's not just designed for protecting women. The context that most of us view it is on sports boards discussing how opportunities for men are held back (expanding D-1 MLax) or sports are disbanded (wrestling) to help the athletic departments comply with Title IX that makes us think it's designed to protect women. The leading cause of non-compliance by schools is the 65 or 85 scholarships for D-1 football (as well the other expenses it has). D-1 schools that don't have varsity football don't have deal with that handicap to compliance. Look at Marquette. It doesn't have a varsity football team, so I would be shocked if their men's and women's sports are not very close to being fully compliant with Title IX based on the male/female ratio of their students. The Ivies work on the D-3 model, so their athletes have to apply for financial aid through the regular process used by all students, eliminating the primary Title IX problem right there. Their Title IX problem is trying to get the expenditures for their sports programs to be relatively the same. For them, if they're maximizing the number of women's teams; giving them full access to all athletic department facilities; and allocating the women's teams a budget that funds just about any reasonable request, they should be OK in the eyes of the Department of Education, the Title IX enforcement arm. Revenue generation has nothing to do with any aspect of Title IX. Senator John Tower of Texas tried to get football exempted from Title IX about the time it was enacted, primarily using the argument it made money and paid for everything else, and was turned down. Schools make money from their patents, but discrimination of any sort in that money-making area is not exempted from Title IX. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Lacrosse Board
ACC 'Expansion' Thoughts
Top
Bottom